This contest petition to punish respondents for violating a High Court interim order regarding a cricket stadium board. The court found no material to establish violation due to lack of supporting reply affidavit and closed the case without costs.
The contempt case is closed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3256 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2299 OF 2022
(Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 17106122 in WP No.25329 ot 2022\
Between:
M.Vijay Raja, S/o Late N/uthu, Aged about 47 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o Chennapuram Village, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
...CoNTEMPT PETTTTONER AND
Sri Ramalingam, The Commissioner, Jawaharnagar Municipal Corporation Jawaharnagar, Kapra Mandal It4edchal-lvlalkajgiri District.
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT NO.4
For the Petitioner : SRI K.VAMSHIKRISHNA, Advocate
For the Respondent :SRl B.JAGAN MADHAV RAO (SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES, MEDCHAL)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.2299 of 2022
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri B.Jagal Madhav Rao, learned Standing Counsei for the respondent.
2
6, In the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to proceed further against the respondent and accordingly the Contempt Case is closed. However, it is left open to the petitioner to initiate proceedings afresh, if there is any violation of the order by the respondents in future. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this contempt
case shall stand closed.
To
Sd/-K-SAI SHI DEPUTY RE RAR SECTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY//
Kj \ X-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1710212023
ORDER
0!.'
CC.No.2299 of 2022
THE CC IS CLOSED WITHOUT COSTS. cg6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent violated the interim order of the High Court by removing and re-erecting a cricket stadium board against the interim orders.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Vijay Raja
Sri Ramalingam
Mummini Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
