Disposed
Sadineni Madhuri v. Smt. Vakati Karuna, I.A.S.
Telangana HCCC/2060/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
[321s I
,[
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OFJANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVIDEVI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2060OF 2022
Contempt Case under Sections10 to12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971 to punish the respondents for willful disobedience and deliberateviolation of the Order passed in W.P.No.29651 ot2022 dated 19.07.2O22
Between:
Sadineni Madhuri, Wo. M.NarasimhaRao, Aged about 47 years, Occ School Assistant (maths), Z.P.H.S., SchoolCo Education, Manuguru, Manuguru mandal' Bhadradri KothagudemDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
Smt. Vakati Karuna, l.A.S., Workingas Principal Secretaryto Government of Telangana, School Education Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad.
RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.A PHANI BHUSHAN(Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondent: GPFoR SERVICE 'I
The Court made the following: OROER
THE HOI{'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI co ITTEMPT CASE N0.20,60 of 2o22
ORDER:
There is no representation on behalf of the pr:titioner
Learned A tsistant Government Pleader for Se,rvices-l had produced a copJ of memo dated lO. lO.2O22 b', wlrich the representation ol the petitioner has been dispost, d of. She submits the orde' of this Court has thus been corrplir:d with. Learned Assistan Government Pleader further su tr:ritt ed that the copy of thr memo dated LO.LO.2O22 has also been communicated to -he petitioner through the office ot the District Educational Office r, Bhadradri Kothagudem District
In view of {he same, the Contempt Case is c orsed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneotls applications, if any pending, shal :rlso stand
clo sed
Sd/- T, KRISHNA KUMAR D[:PUn'REGI/RAR
//TRUE COPY//
S :CTION bFFICER
To,
pr NJB (
HIGH COURT
PMD,J
DATED:2710112023
:; IATi
t/ <br>rJ I i',ri ,:r-
ORDER
CC.No.2060 of 2022
CLOSING THE CONTEMPTCASE
WITHOUT ]OSTS
U('lt)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.29651 of 2022 dated 19.07.2022Referred¶9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sadineni Madhuri
Smt. Vakati Karuna
P. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court