Smt. Masula Swaroopa v. Shiva Prasad Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the High Court examined allegations of wilful violation of an interim order by a police sub-inspector and others. The Court found no justification for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents and closed the case while allowing the petitioners legal remedies for other grievances.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; liberty given to petitioners to approach appropriate forum regarding removal of grave.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1826 OF 2023
Between:
- 'l . Smt. Masula Swaroopa, Wo. Narsimulu, Aged 38 years, Occ. Agriculture,
- Smt. Kalamma, Wo. Rangaiah, Aged 50years, Occ. Agriculture,
Both are Rl/o. H. No. 3-411, Devulapally Village, Kowdipally Mahdal, Medak District.
...Petitioners
AND
- Shiva Prasad Reddy, S/o. Not known to Petitioners Aged Major, Occ. Sub-lnspector of Police, Kowdipally Police Station, Medak District.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether there was willful or deliberate disobedience of the interim order by Respondent No. 2 and 3 (police sub-inspector and others) regarding the interim order in W.P. No. 75629 of 2023.
Whether the order passed in W.P. No. 75629 of 2023 was violated by the illegal trespass and damage of grave.
Whether the respondent should be subjected to contempt proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Masula Swaroopa
- petitioner
Kalamma
- respondent
Shiva Prasad Reddy
- respondent
Gurujala Mahadev Lokesh
- respondent
Ajith
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1826/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court