Y.Venkata Ramana v. Sri N.Sridhar, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
The Contempt Court held that the respondent had complied with earlier orders by crediting arrears and revised pension to the petitioner. No order was passed on the petition regarding calculation method of the amount. The contempt case was closed.
What the court decided
132521
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1610 OF 2023
Contempt Case under Section 10 to 12 of Contemptof Courts Act,1971 to punish the Respondents for willful, deliberate and intentional violation of orders of this Court dated27l12l2O22made inW.P. No.46154of 2022.
Between:
Y.Venkata Ramana, (EC No. 401 7198) S/o. Raghavulu,Agedabout 63 years' Retired as General Mazdoor(Surface) Rio. FlatNo. 302, 3rd Floor,Anu Classic, Plot No. 50, 3rd Cross Road, SairamNagar, Near Social 99 Drive ln' Nallagandla, Hyderabad
...Petitioner
AND
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Y.Venkata Ramana
- respondent
Sri N.Sridhar
Coram
Surepalli Nanda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1610/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court