The High Court dismissed the appeal suit for non-prosecution. The appellant failed to appear despite multiple adjournments, and the court found no valid reason for the delay.
The appeal suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32161
I I t
I I 1 I
oF TELANGANA
rN rHEHIGH "ou*If3$otffoB',sE
"'i?A'tlB'u#"BTJ"-tlJ-1;.,"-'-'#'-
PRESENT
THEHONOURABLESRI JUSTICE M'LAXMAN
AP PEALSUIT NO:3M7OF2000
AppealUnder section 96 and Order 41 of CPC ' aggrieved by the order and decreedated 06.092000passed in I'A'NO38/9'1in O.S'No 19 of 1987 on the file of the Courtof the Senior CivilJudge' Siddipet' Medak District'
Between:
KurthiwadaKashinath Alias KashinathamS/o Rameshwaram' aged about 36 years, Occ:Typist' R/o Siddipet'lr'4edakDistrict
...APPELLANT/DEFENDANT
AND
...RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
\
siddipet, ,"orn o,r,rtll
(Respondents 4 to 7 are not necessary parties to this Appeal)
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANTS
Counset for the Appeilant: SRt. D DEVENDER RAO(NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI p 8HASKAR
The Court made the foltowing: JUDGMENT
lt
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEM. LAXMAN
APPEAL SUIT NO -34470F 2000
JUDGMENT:
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. K SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR qb
SECTION OFFICER
To,
pt <sup>,"
ADK
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1210912023
JUDGMENT
AS.No.3447 of 2000
'.1'', A}E
o
,
).6
a
t
o6 $fi2u1
*
DISMISSING THE APPEAL
SUIT FOR NON.PROSECUTION
s
X
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal suit should be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kurthiwada Kashinath Alias Kashinatham
Kurthiwada Ashok
M. Laxman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
