Dismissed

Mohd. Parvez v. A.P. State Electricity Board

Telangana HC12 Sept 2023AS/2920/2000

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal suit was dismissed for non-prosecution. The appellant counsel failed to appear despite adjournments, seeking time to argue, which the court denied. Consequently, the appeal challenging an electricity assessment notice was dismissed without costs.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the appeal suit for non-prosecution without costs. Closure of miscellaneous petitions pending.

Mohd. Parvez Vs A.P. State Electricity Board — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²¹⁶ I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAO

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^M.LAXMAN

¶6

APPEAL SUIT NO: 2920 OF 2000

¶7

Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against^{the Judgmentand Decree.Dated} 29-9-2000 made in o.S.No.99 0f^{1996 0n the file of the courtof the I Additional} Senior Civil Judge, Warangal.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mohd. Parvez, S/o Mohd. Mahmood Ali Business^{R/o 13-3-139, Phataq} Street, Warangal

¶10

..APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF^{- 2}

¶11

AND

¶12

¶13

A.P. State Electricity Board, rep. by Superintending^{Engineer Warangal}

¶14

2 A.P. State Electricity Board, rep. by Divisional^{EngineerElectrical Distribution,} Warangal

¶15

J A.P. State Electricity Board, rep. by Assistant^{EngineerDistribution, Station} Road, Warangal

¶16

4 Assistant Accounts Officer, Electricity Revenue^{OfficerAPSEB Papaiahpet} Chaman, Warangal

¶17

...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS

¶18

5 G. Neel Kumar, S/o Vijaya Kumar Rlo^{14153411,Peddavangara(V),} Wardhannapeta (M), Warangal Diskict

¶19

...RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF^.1

¶20

CMP. NO: 20833 OF 2000

¶21

Petition under section 151^{CPC praying thatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the operation of the Judgment^{and Decree of the Court of lst Addl. Senior} Civil Judge, Warangal dated 29-9-2000^{passed in O.S.No.99 of 1996 in so farit} directs the petitioner to deposit the^{amountsas indicated, pending disposalof the} above appeal.

¶22

Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. T SRIKANTH^REDDY

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 4 : SRl.^{ZAKIRALI DANISH} ( sc FoR T.s.E.B)

¶24

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶25

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.^LAXMAN

¶26

APPEAL suIT NO.2920 0F 2000

¶27

JUDGMENT:

¶28

Inspite of granting several adjournments,^{on O5.O9.2O23} learned counsel for the appellant^{reportnot ready and the matter} is posted to today under the caption^{for dismissal.Inspite of the} appeal is listed under the caption for^{dismissal; today also seeks} time to advance the arguments.

¶29

The suit is filed by the appellant^{challengingthe assessment} notice dated 09.01.1996 for consumption^{of electricitycharges} and the sarne was dismissed.^{No stay is granted by this Court;} perhaps the recovery must have been done.

¶30

Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is^{dismissed fornon-} prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous^{petitions, pendingif any,}

¶31

shall stand closed.

¶32

DEPU'"S7*- SD/. B SATYAVATHI, \

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The^I Additional^{Senior Civil Judge, Warangal(withrecords'if any)} Z. One CC^{to SRl.T SRIKANTH REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]} a O;"^{CC to SRl. ZAKIR ALI DANISH' Advocate [OPUC]} 4. Two CD^CoPies

ADK

HIGH COURT

DATE D: 1 210912023

JUDGMENT

AS.No.2920 of 2000

1 69 srAf€_
q
cJ
irJ 0 2 FEB 202[ .B

ot114 -f i

¶43

DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS

¶44

b
\ LD
\

Mohd. Parvez v. A.P. State Electricity Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Parvez v. A.P. State Electricity Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Addula Gopal Reddy Vs Kodiganti Shanker Reddy

Bojja Radha Bai and 4 others Vs P. Prasad and 2 others

Mekala Sanjanna ( died) Vs Kudukuntla Kousalya

M.Balamani and 2 Ors. Vs Mr.a.Mahesh Kumar and Anr.

Malothu Saravva Vs Nerella Kanakaiah and 3 Ors.

K.Kashinath Alias Kashinatham Vs K.Bhoomalingam and Others.