The High Court of Telangana dismissed an appeal suit filed in 2000 for non-prosecution after the appellant failed to appear or file representations despite multiple listings under the dismissal caption.
Dismissed the Appeal Suit for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3216 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN
APPEAL SUIT- NO:2362OF 2000
Appeal Under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree Dated 29.03.2000 made in O.S.No. 51 of 1995 on the fite of the Senior Civil Judge, Nalgonda.
Between:
Noorunnisa Begum Wife of M.A.Razzak, aged about 46 years, Occ: Household, Resident of H.No. 5-6-253, Bottuguda, Nalgonda Towh.
...PETITIONER/APPELLANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS
...RESPONDENT
CMP. NO: 16668 OF 2000
Petition under order41 Rule 5 ofC-P C praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition,the High court may be pleased that till disposal of the appeal, theoperation of iudgmentand decree passed by Senior Civil Judge, at Nalgonda,in O.S.No' 51 of 1995 dated 29-3-2000 be stayedincluding its execution if any.
CMP. NO: 16669 OF 2000
Petition under Order 39Rule 1 &2 R/w Section 151 CPC prayingthatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition,theHigh court may bepleased totill disposal of the appeal, the respondents herein be restrained by way of TEMPORARYINJUNCTIONfrom interfearing in peaceful possession of the petitioner, in the interestof justice
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl.K N VIJAYA LAXMI(Not Present) Counsel for the RespondentNo. 1: SRl. P. SRI HARSHA REDDY
Counsel for the RespondentNo. 4: SRl. N. PRAVEENKUMAR
(SC FOR MUNICIPALITY,TELANGANA)
The Court delivered the following:JUDGMENT
1.
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE M. LAXMAN
APPEAL SUIT NO.2362 OF 2OOO
JUDGMENT:
1 . On O4.O4.2O22 there was no representation from the appellant. On 05.09.2023 also there was no representation from the appellant and the matter is posted to 12.09.2023 under the caption for dismissal. Inspite of the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal; today also there is no representation from the appellant.
sd/- B. SATYAVATHI / DEPUTYREGISTRAR /
S"/
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
to'.,. ,n" Senior Civil Judge, Nalgonda (with^records' if any) i. or;;t,;snr x r'rl-vrieVA r-nxr'trt'Adl9"-"l"Jitur?LANGANA) toPucl ;. il; dcio snr' N PRAVEENKUMAR-(sc.F,oF 4. one ccto SRl p shlHits'Hn ilooV' AdvocateloPucl 5. TwoCD CoPies
s
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1210912023
JUDGMENT
AS.No.2362 of 2000
)
r s 0Et 2U3 ),jC-:
'r)
* DI: qr)/,j
DISMISSING APPEAL SUIT
FOR NON.PROSECUTION
cqi'8 a<sup>r\s
Noorunnisa Begum
Qhousja Begum
Kursheed Begum
Jamal Khan
Nalgonda Municipality
The Station House Officer
Justice M. Laxman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
