In a PIL filed regarding tenders for HDPE pipes in Telangana, the High Court noted that the underlying work ended on 31.03.2019. It held that the cause no longer survives and disposed of the petition without costs.
Petition disposed of without orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Ju.isdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION(PI L) NO: 126 OF 2017
Between:
Kotha Shankar Reddy , S/o.KothaVenkat Reddy, Aged about 25 years, Occ: Business, R/o,H.No.1-168/18, Ramanujapuram, Uppalancha Shaligowrarammandal,Naigonda Oistrict
...PETITIONER
ANO
Petition underArticle226 of the constitutionof lndia ';j:i:l::T: circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issuewrit, order or direction moreparticularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus ndent inapprovingthe tender submitted by the declaringthe action oi the 2nd respo es for intravillage network under petitionerfor supply and delivery of HDPE pip as illegalandarbitrary3s {hs3rd missionBhagiratha in the State of Telangana his convictionin a Criminal Case resPondentfailed to furnishthe detailsabout nder itemNo'2 (Xll)of the tender CC.No.321of 2016'dt.O4-11-2016as requiredu declarethe action of the 2nd notificationas the3rd respondent and alsoto -lll/HDPEPiFjes/RCTenderlr' & resPondentin lssuing a letter NoAEE1 /DEE pondentinviting him to enterinloa oc/Rws&s/2016dated 06.0320'17to the 3rdres s. asillegal, arbitrary rate contractfor suPplyanddelivery of HDPE PiPe
P PL P o: 08 F 017 Praylngthal in thecircumstances statedin the PetitionunderSecti*, t', ",C theHigh court maybe Pleased to direct the affidavitfiled in support of the Petition' tothe 3rd respondent forsuPPlYand delivery 2ndrespo ndent not to PlaceanY orders rk undermissionBhagirathain the Stateof ofHDPEPiPes for intra village netwo writ Petition(PlL) Telangana,Pending thedisPosalof the Counselfor th "P"tition"''SRI' A PRABHAKAR RAO
t Nos.1& 2 counselfor theResPonden PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT GPFOR
Counselfor the ResPondent No'3:NONEAPPEARED
TheCourt made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE TTIE CHIEF JUSTICE SAAISH CIIANDRA SIIARMA AND
TIIE HON'BLE SRI JT'STICE ABIIINAND KI.,MAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION I l No.126 ot 20L7
ORI)ER, rn". *l. a,",bte tE chiel rustie sotish ch@dru shntua)
The petitioner has filed the present writ petition (public interest litigation) in respect of tenders invited in the year 2Ol7 for manufacture, supply and delivery of HDpE pipes in the State of Telangana.
The reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2 reveals that the work in question has come to an end on 31.03.201g and the cause does not survive Resultantly, the present B'nt petition (public interest litigation) stands disposed of.
t I
To,
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs
o.."riR+'".,+,siFfF //rRUE copy// ;. s#jt$rmir:rn:;]
CHR BS ..+
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/0212022
ORDER
W. P.(PIL).N o126 of 20'17
e STATE
1
q
I o 25 ttB 2S22
\o
3
<br>
DrsPosrNG oF THE W.P.(PlL) WITHOUT COSTS
2-<sup>\z f-
! I
I
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition concerning tender for HDPE pipes survives as the work has come to an end.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kotha Shankar Reddy
The State of Telangana
The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Water Supply & Sewerage Development Department
Pavitra Pipes Private Ltd
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
