Dismissed

Ravi Bhuwalka v. State Bank of India

Telangana HC3 Nov 2022WP/966/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Telangana disposed of Writ Petition No. 966 of 2020, filed by Ravi Bhuwalka against State Bank of India regarding auction sale certificate, dismissing the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner to pursue proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of writ petition granted with liberty to pursue pending application before Debts Recovery Tribunal; matter disposed of as withdrawn without costs.

Ravi Bhuwalka Vs State Bank of India — Banking and Recovery | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

[³³⁰⁶ ]

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 966 OF 2020

¶8

Between:

¶9

Ravi Bhuwalka, S/o Shri Sajan Bhuwalka, Aged about 35 yrs Occ Business 2979, 12th Main Sth Cross, HAL 2nd Stage, lndiranagar Bengaluru-560038.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

State Bank of lndia, SME Branch, Somajiguda 6-3-652, Kowtilya, Amrutha Estates, Somajiguda Hyderabad-500 082. Rep.by its Authorized Officer

¶13

State Bank of lndia, (Formerly State Bank of Hyderabad lndustrial Finance Branch, Topaz Building, Amrutha Hills Panjagutta, Hyderabad, Rep.by its Authorized Officer

¶14

a. ASneCfliioia) t-ta., s-a-:ss and 355, Unit No.807, Raghava Ratna Towers[) Abids, Hyderabad-SO0 00'1. Rep.by its Authorized Officer.

¶15

1. PCH Global Systems Private Limited, Registered H.No.3-21, Pugalada Yamnampet Village, Ghatkesar, Hyderabad.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may^be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to^{receive the balance payment as per the} auction conducted on 2.'1.2o14^{by them by virtue of auction notice dt.16.11.2013} from the^petitioner and^{issue sale certificate and register the same'}

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶19

Petition under Section^{151CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant} stayofallfurtherproceedingsagainsttheRespondentsNo.,|to3proceeding underSARFAES|ActagainstthepropertyAllthatpartandparcelofthesemifinishedresidentialpropertyconsistingongroundfloorofSreemukhRockLeveiz complex,RoadNo.l2,BanjaraHillsinSurveyNol2g/38'MunicipalNo'8-2-684/2' earstwhileshaikpetvilage,Hyderabad,admeasuring3g00sqfeetincludingbuilt-

¶20

upcommon area two car^parking units servant^{quarter along with 118 sq.yards of} undivided share within the boundaries mention in auction notice dt.'16.11.2013 issued by the respondent bank including conducting any^further auction,^issuance of sale certificate if any pending disposal of the W.P.

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearrng of W.P.No.966 of 2O2O, by fixing an early date for final hearing as expeditiously as possible.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. SMRITI JASWAL

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SR A. KRISHNAM RAJU

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI M. SRINIVAS

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI G.V.B. SANTHOSH KUMAR

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

-2-

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND

¶34

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO

¶35

WRIT PETITION No.9 66 0F 2020

¶36

ORDERa Per lTon'ble Sri Justice P.Naueen Reo)

¶37

In view of the restoration of the writ petition, learned Senior Counsel seeks to withdraw tlle writ petition to pursue the pending Securilization Application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

¶38

Granting the said liberty, writ petirion is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

SD/.MOHD.SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSTSTATyI REGTSTRAR I/TRUE COPY/I (_1D . ( SECTION OFFICER

¶40

To,

¶41

One CC to M/S. SMRITI JASWAL Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

Z- One CC to SRl. A. KRISHNAM RAJU Advocate [OPUC] J- One CC to SRl. M. SRINIVAS Advocate IOPUCI 4.q One CC to SRl. G.V.B. SANTHOSH KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies CHR SW, g

I 1

-l

HIGH COURT

DATED:0210312023

ORDER

W.P.No.966 of 2O20

.\ 'AE siA IA
a, 1t ilN rla
d

¶52

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶53

v>
X-''- --1-
/t /t;
/--'

Ravi Bhuwalka v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Bhuwalka v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Gattineni Lakshmi Paravathi and another Vs Punjab National Bank

M/s. Durga Jewellers and Gems Pvt. Ltd., And Another Vs The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd., And 8 Others

M. Rama Krishna Vs The Union of India

Sri Sarigommula Babu Rao Vs Union of India

Smt. Waheeda Sultana Vs Mohd. Ameeruddin

Smt. Waheeda Sultana Vs Mohd. Ameeruddin