oRDER Hon 'ble Sn P.Na Heard Sri Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for the ist respondent and Sri K.Keertivardhan Re ddy, learned counsel appearing for respondents 3 and 4. 2. Petitioner is a guarantor to the loan secured try ths 3.a respondent from the State Bank of India-2,d respondent. As the borrower defaulted in repayment of loan, the Bank classified the loan account of the petitioner as a Non-perfolming Agsqt and has takea recourse to the _ _ provisions of the securitisation and Reconstruction of Financiar Assets and Enforcement of Securit5r Interest Act, 2OO2. ?he Bank filed O.A.No.642 of 20lZ before the Debts Recovery lyibunal_l at Hyderabad (for short.the Tribunal) to recover a sum of Rs.g,40,90,4S 1/ -. The petitioner herein was arrayed as Sth defendant. By order dated 31.01.2018, all the defendants in O.A., including petitioner herein was set ex parte. petitioner filed I.A.No.751 of 201g under Order IX Rule 9 of Code of Civil procedure to set aside the er parte order d,ated, 3l.Ot.2ol9. The Court is informed that this I.A was not considered, whereas the Tribunar ha s proceeded to consider the O.A., on merits and by order da: ;d LZ.O4.2O1g, the O.A was finally disposed o[ granting recovery certificate in favour of the 2d respondent_Bank. I{aving come
