Petitioners challenging land acquisition compensation sought to withdraw their writ petition. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REODY
WRIT PETITION NO: 9570 OF 2020
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notification issued u/s 3-A and the Land Acquisition Award proceedings No.C/152212017 dated 29-10-2019 u/s 3-G of National High Ways Act, 1956 in so far as awarding a meager compensation amount only in respect of houses of the petitioners without awarding the compensation in respect of petitioners acquired land in Sy.No. 47 situated at
Raghavapurain (V) Mol re (M) Suryapet district by the respondenl Nc. 3 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to S:ction 3-G of the National HighwaysAct,11156and also contrary to the provisic rs of the Right to Fair Compensation and Tr:rnsparancy in Land Acquisition, Reh rbilitation and Resettlement (Act No. 30) Act, 2013 and consequently direct thr respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of thepetit rners land and H.Nos. 6-108, 6-107, 6-109, 6-105 and 6- 114 situated in Sy.N 47 of Raghavapuram (V) Mothe (M) Suryapet district without passing awa 1 by determining the compensation in rer;pect of both acquired land and hou ;es of thepetitioners andpayment of the comrensation.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under ;ection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sl :port of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents not o interfere withpeaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land and H.Nos. 6-'1 08, 6-107, 6-109, 6-105 and 6-' 14 situated in Sy.No. 41 of Ragha /apuram (V) Mothe (M) Suryapet district vrithout passing award by determinir; the compensation in respect of both acquired land and houses of the petitio rers and payment of the compensation to thr: a6qr,r"O ,unO and structures, pendi rg disposal of W.P.
lA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed in s rpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents t( pass a comprehensive award/supplemer tary award by determining the cor rpensation amount in respect of petitioners,' acquired land situated in Sy.No. 4', Raghavarapuram (V) Mothe (tV), Suryapel district pending disposal of W.P,
lA NO: 3 OF 2020
Between:
National Higl-rray Authority of lndia, rep. by its Project Direct:r, D.No. 6-116/89, Mama a Hospital Road, Khammam
Petition e r/Res pond e nt No.4
AND
3
l
... Respo nd e nts/Respon d ents
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order daled 0110712020 passed in lA.No 1 o'f 2020 in WP.No 957012020.
lANos.4&5OF2020 (Common CT)
Between:
...Petitioners/Respondents No.2 & 3 in WP
AND
-k"
.. . Respondent/Respondent Nos.1 & 4 in WP
tA NO.4 0F 2020
Petition unde Section 151 CPC praying that in the circums;tances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may' be pleased to vacate the interim >rder granted on 0110712020 in W.P No.9570 of 2020 and dismiss the Writ pet ion as devoid of merits.
lA NO: 5 OF 2020
Petition unde Section 151 CPC praying that in the circum:itances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim c der granted on 01 .07.2020 in P.No 9570 of 2020 and dismiss Writ petition as devr id of merits.
Counsel for the Pe itioners: SRI L. PREETHAM REDDY
Counsel for the Re ;pondent No.1: SRI NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, Asst. So LGene ra I
Counsel for the Re ipondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Re ;pondent No.3: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
Counsel for the Re ;pondent No.4: SRI A. LAXMINARAYANA, SC for NHAI
The Court made th r following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A,ABIfISHEI( REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.9570 of 2020
ORDER:
The learnecl counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of
the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
1
SD/-M.MANJULA ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, l.TwoccstotheGPforRevenue,Highcou.rt.fortheStateofTelang-ana[oUT] i i;; Ca; i; iil cptor r-ino ncq'uisiiion, Hish Court for the State of
Telanqana [OUT] 3. o;;'i6'i; bnrLl pnEerHAMREDDY, Advo-cltgloPUCl ; 5;; cc i; sRiNnHaevnnApuRAJESHWARRAo, Asstsol General TOPUCI s. b-ne-ct to A.LAXMINARAYANA,sc for NHAI [oPUc]
MRC
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210312022
ORDER
WP.N0.9570 of 2020
/]
.i'
{-
t-i<br>rrl
r.i
i
a- ') 1s
/
&- ,r!'-rr':-'
-r..-i. -.t.
DISMISSING THE \T RIT PETITION AS WTTHDRAWN/\ TTHOUT COSTS.
b
#x,
/ ,7'
Boddu Lingaiah
Ch. Ravichandra
Mamidi Venkata Narsu
Shaik Ran (Rafi)
Gunaganti Lalitha
Union of India
A. ABHISHEK REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
