Dismissed

Chakali Ramulu and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC22 Mar 2022WP/12892/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged a notice by the Gram Panchayat under Article 226 seeking declaration of illegality under Panchayat Raj Act and fundamental rights. The Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that petitioners had already approached the Civil Court for an injunction and must exhaust remedies in O.S.No.263 of 2022.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed on the ground that petitioners must work out remedies in the concurrent civil suit for injunction.

Chakali Ramulu and 3 others Vs The State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF IUARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 12892 OF 2022

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

'1 . Chakali Ramulu, S/o. Late.lr/alkaiah, aged about 57 years, Occ Farmer, R/o H.No. 3-57, Marepally village, Kondapur Mandal, Sangareddy Districl502306.

¶8

Chakali Gopal, S/o. Late.lr/alkaiah, aged about 54 years, Occ Pvt Job, R/o H.No. 3-58, Marepally village, Kondapur ltIandal, Sangareddy District-502306.

¶9

Chakali Narayana, S/o late. lValkaiah, aged about 50 years, Occ Farmer, Rl/o H.No.2-44, Marepally village, Kondapur Mandal, Sangareddy District-S02306.

¶10

Chakali Yenkaiah, S/o late. Malkaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ Farmer, Ri/o H.No.5-2, Marepally village, Kondapur Mandal, Sangareddy District-502306

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

The District Collector, Sangareddy Mandal and District.

¶15

The District Panchayat Officer, Sangareddy Mandal and District

¶16

The Marepalle Gram Panchayat, Rep, by Secretary, It4arepalle Village, Kondapur Mandal Sangareddy District, Telangana State.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Wrrt, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the notice dated 04/03/2022^{given by the} Respondent No.4 herein as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14,21^and 300 (A) of the Constitution of lndia and the Provisions of^{PanchayatRajAct.}

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶20

Petition under S€ rtion^'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstan:es stated in the affidavit filed in su rport of the petition, the High Court may br: pleased to direct the Respondents rot to demolish the shed situated in survey no.215(Grama Kantam),H.No .2-8712, i dmeasuring 98 Sq.Yards, lvlarepalle Villag,;, Kondapur Ir/andal, Sangareddy D stricts, Telangana State pending disposal c,f the above writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitior ers: SRI CHAKALI SRIKANTH

¶22

Counsel for the Respor dent No's. 1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RA.J

¶23

Counsel for the Respor dent No.4: SRI M.RAM GOPAL RAO(SC FOtt GRAM PANCHAYAT),

¶24

The Court made the fol owing: ORDER

¶25

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 12892 of 2022 ORDER:

¶26

Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj appearing for respondent Nos.l to 3 and learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4. With their consent, the present Writ Petition is being disposed of at the adrnission stage itself.

¶27

Questioning^{the noticedated 04.03.2022 issued by the} respondent No.4 Marepalle Gram Panchayat, rep. by Secretary, Marepalle Village, Kondapur Mandal, Sangareddy District, the petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition.

¶28

Having regard to the fact that the petitioners have already approached the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, by way of filing O.S.No.263 of 2022 for injunction, the petitioners have to work out their remedies in O.S.No.263 of 2022 itself and they cannot approach this Court on the ground tl.rat no interim orders are^passed by the civil

¶29

2 AAR. J $ P No 12892 of2022

¶30

Court ir.r the said suit.^{Hence,this Court is not in< lined to}

¶31

entertain the^present Writ^Petition.

¶32

Accorr ingly, this Writ Petition^{is dismissed.}

¶33

Misce. laneous applications, if^{any pending. shall stand}

¶34

ciosed. Ther : shall be no order^{as to costs.}

¶35

SD/.T,KRISHN,q KUMAR ASSTSTANT REGTSTRIIR /iTRUE COPY'

t,._,,'

SECTION OFFICER

'1 . One CC to SRl. CH \KALI SRIKANTH Advocate IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FO t PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV ,High Court lor the State of Telangana. OUTI 3. One CC to SRl. M.F AIV GOPAL RAO(SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYpT), Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies. 5. One Spare Copy. LrtJ NN

HIGH COURT

DATED:22103120^r-2

ORDER

o iiiJ 5 ,lr
k
4<br>f'
'
i 1BF.':
I

WP.No.12892 of 2022

DISMISSING THT WP

WITHOUT COST:;.

fiffi

Chakali Ramulu and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chakali Ramulu and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Sri Kaustubha Housing Projects India Private Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

S.M.Somasekhar Vs The State of Telangana

Patti Raja Gopal Vs The Telangana State Information Commission

M/s. Sri Venkateshwara Traders and Another Vs The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Boddu Lingaiah and 4 others Vs Union of India and 3 others

A.Suresh Goud Vs The State of Telangana