Dismissed

Sri Vijayalaxmi Girijana (St) Isuka quarry Labour Contract Mutual Aided Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Union of India

Telangana HC19 Apr 2022WP/8358/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgement records the order by which the High Court of Telangana permitted the petitioners in WP Nos. 8358 of 2022 to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one, consequently dismissing the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted liberty to withdraw the Writ petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition as and when cause of action arises.

Sri Vijayalaxmi Girijana (St) Isuka quarry Labour… — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 8358 OF 2022

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

Sri Vijayalaxmi Girijana (ST) lsuka^quarry Labour Contract lrlutual Aided Cooperative Society ltd, (ST) lsuka^quarry Labour Contract lVlutual Aided Cooperative Society ltd., at Eturu(v), Kannaigudem^(lt/) l\r'lulugu District, (Reg. no. AMCMGL/DCO/2O14/3909) rep. by its president K. Sarvesh

¶8

Ganganamma Adivasi [t4ahila lsuka quarry Contract [t4utual Aided Cooperative Society Ltd, (reg. no.54Att4C/DCO/JSK/2018) at Rampur Agraharam(v) Etu runagaram(tr/ ) l,4ulugu District, rep. by its^president Sonapa Ra m ad evi

¶9

Devi Adivasj lsuka Quarry Labour Contract And Thrift lt/utual Aided Cooperative Society, Limited at Rampur Agrahararn^(v) Eturunagaram^(lV) l,4ulugu District (Reg. no. AI/C/IVLGi2020l1 ) Rep. by its^president Eesam lnd ira.

¶10

Sri Ramadevi Adivasi [r/ahila lsuka Quarry Contract i,4utual Atded Cooperative Society Ltd, at lvlullakatta (v) Eturunagaram^(lV) lt4ulugu District, (Rep. no.53 AIVC/DCO/JSK/2018) Rep. by its president Gadiga Rama Devi.

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

1 Union of lndia, I,4inistry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (lA division) lndira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jorbagh road, Aliganj, New Delhi - 1 10003 Rep. by its Secretary.

¶14

2 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶15

3 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,^I,4ining and Geology Depaftment, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶16

4 The District Forest Officer, N4ulugu District at tr/ulugu.

¶17

5 The Forest Range Officer, Eturnagaram North, WLIV Range,^Eturnagaram, lVlulugu District.

¶18

6 The District Collector/Chairperson, District Level Sand Committee,^Mulugu. 7 Telangana State [,4ineral Development Corporation Ltd, rep. by^{its frtlanaging} Director, near HI,4WSSB Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

¶19

8 The Assistant Director, IVines and Geology Department, Ivlulugu District at l'4ulugu

¶20

...RESP.NDENTS

¶21

Petition under^{Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCoUrtmaybe pleasedtoissueWritordirectionpreferablyWritofmandamus'declaringthe action of the^{respondentnos' 4 and 5 in interfering wlth the sandde-castinq} actiVitiesofpetitionersinrespectoftheiraIlottedreachesi.e.Eturu(v)of Kannaigudem(M),^{Rampur Agraharam(v) Eturunagaram(M)'andMullakatta(v)} Eturunagaram^{(lr/) of MuluguDistrict, in pursuance of the letter d\ 11112022} issuedbytherespondentnoS,asillegal'arbitraryandviolativeofprinciplesof naturaljusticeandconSequentlysetasidetheletterdt.l/1/2022issuedbythe respondent^no.5.

¶22

IANO: 1O^{F 2022}

¶23

Petition under^{Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated} intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto directtherespondentno.5nottointerferewithde-castingofsandactiVitiesofthe petitioners as^{per their allotments/ agreements' pending the disposalof writ} petition in the interest^{of justice'}

¶24

Counsel for^{the Petitioners : SRI' PRAVEEN BONKURI}

¶25

Counsel^{for the Respondent No' 1 : NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO(ASSGI)} Counsel for^{the Respondent Nos' 2,4 & 5: GP FOR FOREST}

¶26

Counsel^{for the Respondent Nos' 3, 6 & I : GP FOR MINES}

¶27

Counsel for^{the RespondentNo' 7 i'-"""}

¶28

The Court made^{the following : ORDER}

¶29

THI] HO'BI,E SRI JUS TCE ,. AI}IIISIIEK ITEDDY \ RIT PI]TITIo\ \o .tt358 of 2022

¶30

0IIDEIT

¶31

Learned coLlnsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh Writ petition as and when cause o 1' action al ises.

¶32

Permissior.r is accorded and the present Writ petition is dismissed as rvithdrawn with Iibert).as prayed.

¶33

Misccllaneous applicatioirs, i1. any lterrding" shall stand

¶34

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

SD/-P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTR R

,TRUE COPY'

{ To,

S ECTIO N FICER

One CC to SRl. PRAVEEN^{BONKURI,Advocate.} [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRl. NAIr/AVARAPU^{RAJESHWAR RAO(ASSGI)Advocate} [oPUC]

¶40

3, Two CCs to GP FOR^{FOREST, High Court for the Stateof Telangana at} Hyderabad.IOUT]

¶41

Two CCs to GP FOR^{tt4lNES,High Court for the Stateof Telangana at} Hyderabad.[OUT]

¶42

Two CD Copies

¶43

One Spare Copy

SB TR ry

HIGH COURT

DATED:1910412022

ORDER

1 rlE S r.4,
7
o() 22 iit 2022 1iilli
-:'
*'
D6, 9c

¶49

WP.No.8358 of 2022

¶50

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶51

6 4
-

Sri Vijayalaxmi Girijana (St) Isuka quarry Labour Contract Mutual Aided Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Vijayalaxmi Girijana (St) Isuka quarry Labour Contract Mutual Aided Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Kishore Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

The Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited. Vs The State of Telangana

Bollagani Nageswar Rao, And 3 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Vattam Rambabu Vs The State of Telangana

Erukula Ellaiah and 109 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 7 Others

Kolan Prathap Reddy Vs The State of Telengana