Allowed

The Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited. v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Apr 2022WP/6186/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ petition seeking to review a memo transferring fishing rights in four named tanks from one society to a newly formed society in the same village. The court held that failing to give notice to the long-term user and adjudging rights on the same day notice was received violated natural justice, setting aside the memo.

What did the court decide?

The impugned Memo dated 31.01.2022 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the concerned authorities for passing an order taking objections of the petitioner society into consideration.

The Fishermen Cooperative Society… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABA,D (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 6186a nd 13609 OF²⁰²²

¶7

WP No.61 86 0F 2022

¶8

Between:

¶9

The Fishermen Cooperative^{SocielyLimited, Ola Villag,e, Kuntala} H,'tandat.t"tirmal District Rep^{by its President Ramgiri Suresh, S/o Ramgirt} Cr.grJn;i, ;g;-ibort ia^{y6.rr' R/o 3-57, ota-VitlaseKuntaralr'4andal'} Nirmal District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

l.TheStateofTelangana,Rep'by.its,Principalsecretary'Frsheries' o.oJffi;., Secreiariat' HYderabad

¶13

The^{Commissioner of Fisheries' Telangana State' at Hyderabad'}

¶14

The^{DistrictCollector'NirmalDistrictat Nirmal'}

¶15

The^{Assistant Director of Fisheries' NirmalDistrict' at Nirmal'}

¶16

The^{District FisheriesOfficer'NirmalDistrict' at Nirmal'}

¶17

¶18

6.^{The Tahsildar'KuntalaMandel' Nirmal District'} t"'""'^{Re p bv chiefP romoter' Li mba(B)}

¶19

, r-,;LT,T"-ljl rro,*""",^g:l1;ff

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances^{stated in tfte attiOauit filed therewith' the High Court may be} J f ".."a,o ssue : -lr:*l1l;Lk:'T'[:il"".: ] il?::,J: Mandamus^{to declare ,n"} l'"t"_"^:'^],".r rr""tinq^{the sth Respondentto issue} as^{Pa KuntaShikam} 31^{.01 .zozzissuedby the 4th Respondent o''utt'nonu;;} "''' " :i:il:^{I:; I ;: :m :::'i J : [:::1} r :'"'::1i tn : ; :::, u lJ N4andal,^{Nirmal District tt tnt i'n Respondent Society' which} ""^{is rn possessionof}

¶22

¶23

the^{P etitione r societv'as illesal'arbitrarv'*'" :':tl:.,::"1ffi tfi['l":il:} ",^{0,...,0,". or naturar ,:'ji"i;-*Jir 1|l'"llii;proceedinssin rv4emoNo} Tli#H^{;:,[:1:1',;;;;:;"0rv *'e 4'ih ResPondent}

¶24

IA NO:^{10F2 022 022}

¶25

NO:^{10F2 022 022} that^{in the circumstancesstated} P etit^{ion under Section 151 CPCPraylng} h Court^{maY be Pleasedto} avit^{filed in support of the petition't} he Hig in the^affrd in^lr,4em o No.^{121/D/2020dated} susPend^t he operation^{of the Proceedings} tn respect^{of fish tank calledbY four} 31 .o1^{.2022issuedbY the 4th ResPondent} names^{as Pai Kunta ShikamCheruvu'Ped a Cheruvu and ToniCheruvu situated} in Limba^{(B) Viltage,Kuntala Mandal, NirmaI Districtto meet the ends of iustice'}

¶26

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:SRI' T VISHNUTEJA}

¶27

Counsel^{for the Respondent Nos'1,2' 4 & 5: GP FOR FISHERIES}

¶28

Counsel for^{the Respondent Nos'3 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶29

Counsel for the^{RespondentNo-7: SRI D' L' PANDU}

¶30

WRIT PETITION^N o:^{136090F 2022}

¶31

Betwee n:

¶32

The Fishermen cooperative^{Society Limited, Limba (B) Village,Kuntalall4andal} Nirmal District.^{TeianganaState Rep by its President MandulaShanker} S/o l,4. Bheemanna

¶33

...PETITIONER

¶34

AND

¶35

The State of Telangana,^{Rep by Principal Secretary,Animal Husbandry Dairy} Development Fishdries Secietdriat^{at BRKR Bhavan,Tank Bund, Hyderabad}

¶36

The Commissioner of Fisheries^{Shanthi Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana}

¶37

The District Collector, Nirmal District,^{Nirmal Telangana State}

¶38

The Additional Collector Local bodies Nirmal, District Nirmal,^{Telangana State}

¶39

The District Fisheries Officer/ The Assistant Director of Fisheries/^Nirmal District, Nirmal, Telangana State

¶40

The Fisheries Development Officer, Nirmal District,^{Nirmal, Telangana State}

¶41

The Deputy Executive Engineer, lB Sub Division,^{Bhainsa, Nirmal District}

¶42

The Statin House Officer, Kuntala Police^{Station Kuntala, Nirmal District}

¶43

The Grampanchayat, Limba^{(B) Village, Kuntalalr4andal,Nirmal District} Rep by its PanchaYat Secreta ry

¶44

,..RESPONDENTS

¶45

. Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiledtherewith, the High courtmay be} pleased to issue an appropriate^{writ, order or direction more particularlyone in the} nature of wRlT OF^{IVANDAMUSdirecting the Respondents authoritiesto} implement the circular^{tvlemo No.121 lDl2O2Odaled311o112022 issued bv the} RespondentNo.5totheRespondentNo.6tocollecttheleaSeamountofthetank calling with four^{names as (1) Pai Kunta (2) ShikamCheruvu (3) PeddaCheruvu} (4) Torri Cheruvu existing^{in the Limba(B) Grampanchayat area and issue fishing} right to the^{PetitionerSocietY'}

¶46

IA NO :1O^{F 2022}

¶47

petition under Section^{15.1 cpc praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition'the High Court may be pleased to direct} the Respondent^{authorities to implementthe Circular MemoNo 121lDl2O2O} dated^{31/01/2022issued by the RespondentNo 5 to the RespondentNo 6 to} collect^{the lease amountof the tank callingwithfour names "t]1,::' ,:'"t'} (2) Shikam^{Cheruvu(3) Pedda Cheruvu (4) Toni Cheruvuexisting in the} limUa^{(B) Grampanchayatareaand issue fishing right to the Petitioner Society'} pending^{disposalof the mainwrit petition '}

¶48

Counsel^{ior the Petitioner: SRI D' L' PANDU}

¶49

Counsel^{for the Respondent Nos'1' 2' 5 & 6: GP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY} Counsel^{for the Respondent Nos'3 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶50

Counsel^{for the Respondent No'7: GP FOR IRRIGATION AND CAD}

¶51

Counsel^{for the Respondent No'8:GP FOR HOME} Counsel^{for the Respondent No'9:SRI M' RAMGOPALRAO' SC} The^{Courtmade the following: COMMON ORDER}

¶52

¶53

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK^REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.6 186 and 13609 of2022

¶54

COMMON ORDER:

¶55

The memo dated 3l .O1 .2022 passed in File No.1l i lDl2O2O is tlie subjcct rratter in both the \,rir petirions. l'1rt:r',,rli;rr'. thev ure raken up tolacthcr:rncl lteing ciisposcd ol' bt. ', it i.. r'qt111111i111 r11'qlq;

¶56

l'ir1r, Crrc.r,rlirr l\1rnro No.^,l.2 I // l), 2()20. claLccl 3 l.O L2022. 'l hc L)isr.r:t lr'isl-re rie s 0lllccri l.he Assist:r.t Dire ctor ol. Irishclies, Nirmirl Districr, has ciirectecl l.he Irishcries Deveiopment Ofllcer, Nirmal, to coilect lhe lease amount o1. thc tank calling rvith lbur names as pai Kunta, Shikam Cheruvu. Pedda Cheruvu and Torri Cheruvu existing in the Limba (B) Gram Panchayat area and issue fishing right to the Fishermen Coop Society Ltd., Limba (B) of Kuntaia Mandal for the vear 202r-22.

¶57

The case of the petitioner in W.p. No.6lg6 ot 2O22i.e. The Fishermen Cooperati,,.e Society Limited, Ola Village, Kuntala Illrndirl, i n brief', is tlraL thc pctirir.,ner is a r.t_.gistci.ccl Socier.v:ind l'irtrxslltr':ri-r'.rs of business ol. the pctllloncr Sor ir.ir .tr_c thc f.ish st ti.r:t tc,cj rn \ irl, rgt,s O.lit. .;-111-1.2pprr. Lirnb;i i.\t an cl ol f.un La/:r I{id napr-rr A I:r n r i.iJ. r\c1r1ir biicl Drslr.tcl .sr.lt,,,(l lJ.litL ()Llt ol.tltc said t.r 1t^js ftrrrher rrr tiin.J<s, tjtc totai cxtcitt of onc

¶58

2 \r,^, \i(,ri:;r,.

¶59

tank situated in survey No.i41 is about^{Acs.108-07 guntasof} Limba (B) Village, Kuntala Mandal, Nirmal and the^{said tank} exists between Limba^{(B) Village and Ola Village. Itis the} further case of the petitioner herein^{that said tank is also called} as Pai Kunta, Shikam Cheruvu,^{Peda Cheruvuand Torra} Cheruvu as confirmed by^{respondent No.6 uide proceeding} dated 21.10.2021. It^{is further stated that the petitioner-Society} is in possession^{of the above said four tanksincluding the tank} by name Torra^{Cheruvuand the respondentauthorities are} collectrng the^{lease amount in rcspect ol said Torra Chr:ruvt't} along^{u'ith other tanks lromthe lletitioner-Societl'andllle sartc} is cviclent^{lrom the clemancl nottct'sissueci l;r' thc rcspolldcrlt} authorities.^{Norr', it is the gricr,zlrlt:ttlI tI.tc llcl ittont.r.S.lt iclr} that at^{the instanceof respondcntNo 7-societr''the respondcnl} Nos.4^{and 5 are obstructing the pelitioner- Societyin its day-to-} day activities^{in respectof TorraCheruvu' Limba (B) Village' lt} is. the^{grievance of the petitioner that respondent No 4 has} issued^{the impugned proceedingsdated 31'01'2022directirrg} the^{respondent No.5 to issue Iishingrights to respondentNo:7-} Sociery^{for the year 2O2l-22' Hence'W P' No'6186 ol 2022 is} iiled. 2022^{filed bY TheFishermen} W.P.^{No 13609 of} (B) Villagt',^{Kutltali'i\1rr tr rlitl'} CooPerative^{SocietvLrnritccl,l-imlla}

¶60

¶61

rvhich is arrayed as respondent No.7-Societ."' in W.p. No.6186 oi 2022, secking a direction irom this Courr to implerne nt rhe ivlemo No.121IDl2O2O, clatcd 31 .01.20,22.

¶62

A counter alhdavir has been filed in W.p. No.6lg6 of 2022 by the officiai respondents mainly stating that the Limba (B) Viliage is a free Village and not included in the area of operation of any registered Fishermen Coop Society. The . Mutharasi communit5r persons of Limba (B) Viitage of Kuntala Mandal have come forward to organize into a Fishermen Coop. Society under the provisions of The Telangana Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (in shorr 'the Acr,). Hence, primary Fishermen Coop. Society Ltd., Limba (B) h.s been regisrered ,,,",ith l5 members and the errca r_rl'operarion ol.saicl Societv is Limba (Bl Gram panchayat onl-r.. As such. tI.rc respor.r<1ent No.7-Socrer.,,. rs cntitled to get fishing righrs over rhe rrl,o water boclies r.e. Torri Tank @ pai Kunta/pedda Cheruvu/ Shikanr Cheruvu rvith r.vater spread area admeasuring Acs. 10g.07 glrntas and Kotha Cheruvu with water spread area of Acs. 10g.07. ' Therelor'Ircrelore,^rhe impugned Memo dated 31.o1 .2022," ,.-,,^, . : the petitioner society ; :,jil;. :",,[:::.":'.,,0:,n", lveaith for a long period 'loyed^the fishery conrinue such unaurho.":::: anv legal rights cannor claim to rishts Hence, it is prayed to disrnis\iv p -" ":;;',:::r!;n*r

¶63

AAR, J w.P. Nos.6l86 and 13609 ot 2022

¶64

¶65

1 I

¶66

Heard the learned counsel for the respective petitioners, the learned Government Pieader lor Fisheries, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, lcarned Government Pleader for Hc-rmc, the iearned Cor.,t:rnn-rent Plcadcr lol Anirnal Husbanrlrr. irnd Sri D.1,. Parrrlu, learnccl coLtrtst:1. lor^thc rcspoirden l s.

¶67

l iror t1:e sakc ol^{(loll'('lli,:lll(lc' lilr-'} llartic^{s ilfr lrI'i(IiIl'III'} reierred as lo thcy^{are arral'cci:r-r'U P No 6186 of 2022'}

¶68

The subjcct^{matter ol conlroversv in t}'rr: prcsentWrii} Petitron^{is the fishingtank by name'shikamCheruvu" whichis} also known^{by the names of Pai Kunta' Peda Cheruvuand Torra} Cheruvu.^{Admittedly' the said lake is situated in S'No 14i} admeasuring^{about Acs 108-07 guntas within the area of Limba} (B) Village^{lt is the specificcase of the petitioner} ::::.:"" registered^{in the Year 1998' that the area of business operatlons} of the^{Socieh' zrre sprcad ol'ct' I hr: fish tanks situatecl in Olil'} Sutrapur'^{l-irllilrl iK) 'rt''ti \liritrr'lLll. ':11;'g' s t;i Ii"ll'lirll' \1'rr'ri'ri} Adiiabaci^{Disint'i.'-\s lircrc\''rs ll() ()tllcr scp:rrilrciisl-rirlg} sociery^{lor Limba(B) Vrilagc'thc pctitionerSocielvalsoust'c1 lo} concluc!^{tile lishlngope ratiorls in ls o lanks ol Ltnrba (il) Vi'llage} i.e.^{Shikaln Cllcrr'rvu:illtl liothaChcrr-tvu for trlrlre ti'ianLs''r}

decades

)

W P. Nos.6186 and t3609 oI2022

¶73

Learned counsel lor the petitioner has stated that before issuing the impugned proceedings granting fishing rights to respondent No,7 Societ1,, the petitioner \1,.1s neither put on r-rotice nor thcir objecttons !erc taken into account. That since last rnorc than 22 r.ears, the petitioner Socictl is conducting l-isitlng rrghts in resltcct oi' Shil<arn Chcl.ur,,.r. .l.hat more than 80'' rl []ic \'irtL'r s,r-eircr irr.r,r is l,JIirg u.irh, tire iimits oj. ola Viiiage arrcl onlr.20,,is leriiutg rn Ljmbil []l 1i,11"*,,. Llaritccj counsej llas stated that the h:istl npp666rch taken bv thc tru thori ties concerne passing the impugned ordcr is re flectecr by the way in *hr: tnt note was approved by the District colector. Learned "'n ounsel has drawn -wir t hn e att ention of the court to the proposar sent n, ."^ :^-". Fisheries officer and stated that the corector .jJ,"l"::-ct receive( the note on fi 01'2022 at 5 09 p m. n.. uoo.,"''g s.s3 p.m., *.ithour -:::" :'^'":' o,, the vgr]. same da.v at thror-rgh thc b-t'e-ii pcrir jr;nci. Socie t' o. ,u'" n" responden t Socic'tr'.';:,:';::.:; ;.csp.r; rr ie. l s r.,,,r.,, rr,r r, ,.,,]',""n"r r'r''i,s erncl rrrercL' ,,,: ":"'":. ::i;;::;:;":;l D..ris .r Lrrc ir.rirrr,rL,:.. ,,,1:l , !, ( ontl.a. tllc Je tlecl clo'crninr;n t Pic:rclcr ror Fisherres rras'ehemen,rn orrooaatt' I'err mainl.lnabilitl of thc wrir petirion and stated that as admjtte-rc lt1. the pctitioner Socicrv

¶74

¶75

themselves in the ri rit afii<l:rvir, rhc lishing rights ol thc petrtioner Society arc only in respect of the fish ranks situated in Ola, Suryapur, Limba (K) and Midnapur Villages ol Kuntala Mandal and not in respect of the two fish tanks situated in Gram Panchayat jurisdiction of Limba (B) Village. Learned Government Pleader has further stated that merely because^the petitioner Society is conducting fishing rights, the same^does not confer any vested right on the^{petitioner, more so, when} respondent No.7^{is registeredwithin the area of Limba(B)} Village.^{Learned GovernmentPleaderhas furtherstatcd that} the olficial^{rcsllondcrltshavi' scntpultluslv lolloucdthc} proceclure^{contcmlllatedunclerlhc Act ir-r issurng the'irnpugrled} procecdings.^{That the Coilecl.crhas only approved[he notc} submittcd^{b)'the DistrictFisl-reries officcrar-rd no mala flrles can} be attributed^{againsl tht: Collcctor'ltis further stated tiraL} Limba^{(B) Vrllageis a lree VillaSic ancl not includecl in the area of} operation^{of any registered CooperativeSociety' That only after} the^{formation of respondentNo 7SocietY' the impugned} proceedings^{are issuedin favour of respondentNo'7 in respect} of Shikam^{Cheruvu and Kotha Cheruvu situatedinGram} Panchayat^{limits of t'imba (B) Village' Thatonce a {ishing} Society^{is registered in respectof a particular Viilage' the tanks} falling^{within the area of that Village wili have to be necessarily}

¶76

{r'ii .. i^{'..-::rl!1r'::rll::liril} 'i r'1-':

¶77

allotted^{to that Village Societyonly' The petitionerSociety does} not^{haveany vestedright to demand that the fishing rights have} to be^{continuedin their favour' rnore so' whenthe respondent} No.?^{has already been registered for Limba(B) Village 'Learned} Government^{Pleader has also stated that the impugned} proceedings^{are in consonancewith G'O'MsNo'268'Panchayat} Development^{(GP-FIN) Departmentdated} Raj and^Rurai 23.O7.2021.

¶78

'lhougil l-lo coLliltcr n:rs bcetl iilcd on behali^{oi respondent} No.7. the^{ie zrrrLe cl counsel appearlng on iLs behall has stated} lhat^t-he ofllcial responclcnls^{have foliorl eci theprocedure} conternl)1ated uncler lhi: r\cl.^{That respondent No.7 SociolYis} liri'inr'ri rr iiir I5 rnrr--rircrs irt lo:rginq Lr,' l.itiib:t⁽¹³⁾ \ illtigc^:.ttlclats re r-^'.i'Le pior,isions ol lhc Act anci also thc^{guiclelines issucdb1'} the Clovernment, the tanks s'hich arc falling u,ithin the jurisdiction of a particular Village have to be allotted to the Soiietl. regrstered with the Viilagers residing in that particular Village. That admittedly, Shikam Cheruvu and Kotha Cheruvu are falling within the Gram Panchayat jurisdiction of Limba (B) Village and therefore the question of granting any rights ro the pelitioner Societv u,hich is registerccl u,ith the r,illagers of OIa Villaee cioes r-r.o I arise and therelble pral'ed tiLe Cotrrt to clismiss t h i'r \'r ir I)t:: it io;r

¶79

AAR, J W.P- Nos.6186 and )3609 ot 2022

¶80

¶81

Perused the material on record.

¶82

A perusal of the record reveals that til1 the formation of respondent No.7 Society, the petitioner Society was conducting lishing rights rr-r resllect ol Shikam Cherr:vu rthich^js also knotvti as Pai Kunta. Pedda ChcruvlL atrd Torri Cherr-tvL.l.^Thc corrcspOnrle nc(r liat\.iten tl.ic^{1'lt lt sr lclu r- :r r-r cl ihc' l)istrir:t l'isllc l-it's} ()lilcr:r ar-rc1 thtl <.lcm:rt'rtl llolicrr:;^{isstt'rclt'l thc petitiorl'rrSor:rt:tr} fcvcals^{tllat fhe} 1)ctitloll('r^{Socitli\r rv:is crlrltlltctitlg iishir.rgiiqhrs} Er,'en^{rholrgililspeci[icstiLtlr.i]r"rs bt'cn tlil<cn 1>r' tht: petitirltlct-} thill^{no Iloticc \''ls scn'eclou tl're pc'tiliot.rerilcftlrc issuitlgthc} irnpugncd^{orclcr'rhere rs no spt:cilicdeniill in the crounterlilecl} by the^{oflicial respondentsrebuttingthe saLdconrention'} Irrespective^{of the fact whether the petitioneris having any} written^{permission to conductlhe {ishingrights in respectof the} Shikam^{cheruvu till date' or not'. -"} l:::,::"::'":"":: petitioner^{was conducling the flshing operatl} Shikam^{Cheruvu tiilthe impugned orderu'as passed When} valuable^{rights rlfrhe petitionel Societ-v are sought tobe} te rmit-tittccr' '^{thi: tTtitltmut't'tthat 1s cxpectccl lrom tl-rc} -^authorities '" i:onct't't.re<l^{is to ptrt} "''' ""ttt'"''".. ]*:' :::;.",,, '..::::1": clecisior-t^{ltl tht' llrcsctll 'lilstl' tll(' saiTl(1s} tl.tt:^{irrrlluiirlccl ilLdcr is i''it llr' tlitlll ir''L:iplesof llirtr'lll'ii tustic''} and^cquit!'. ./

¶83

o AAR, J W P. i"os.6186 and 13609 ot 2022

¶84

I tI

¶85

l a

¶86

Tl-ris Court as *,ell as the Hon,ble Supreme Court in a cutena Ol cases have hcld that tl-re principles oI natr_tral _justice irnrl irqitit.. are inr,'iolitl:1c r-ind lr,rncla:.ncntal lo thc rights ol the plr''.i( s, irnd thev shr;r-r1cl l)c qivcl-t rri,t ollllof lt llll,.r. ol lte inq hearcl Irr.,lilr-3 ;111-1 orclcrs .ri-r, p.tssiecl aq:rit.tst tht o5dlrrsr Lt'tttli riitcn Ihe're is :l 'Lol.Lio.^{o1' thc} sarnt, ;" . .. l.his Cor,rr.r sirrrng Linder Artrcle 226 o1. rhe Constitu,io,., o; ' India can exercise its r-5qI urse tts judicial power to re'ie . the decisions ,,-.,-^^-l' ;::: .:m;^{..i ,::",;:':.,".:,;,:} ;:::-,' step-in to correct ,n:t^{"o''And if warranted'the} court wirl "ut" The power of judiciar review has been held to form ,n, basic strllcture of the and the said ooo,". .urr,t "o"t"'tion o" controilecl o. . ,oror.isiorr of Statute o.,.'o' b-y an'v milcie thc'reunt'"t'"'uoto irr sfcte gank iioirr;re s,,rpr.(,r,rc.,,,,,,"1,'.ll': "t^"Ecsr & ors.,, rirc-. th;11 Lhc Lrrrlc'r rs liai;re ro bc scL :rsicrc ii.ro opporrrr,,,,''tt,'ltt't' "t^{ir' irrt' :idr'<,rscr.r} ,,r,...,,,1,t .l heitrirlg is ir/lirrdcd to thc- partie s Frrr tlrcr, in lhariamma RoJ the Hon,bi us' rndian Bank & ors.z e supreme courr has h: remedy is availab.le, if . viojation 'd^{that even if an alternative} >f the principles oI natural '⁽²⁰ '?^(203;i i; s33 i;;

¶87

¶88

.justicc^{rs ailcgc'cl. tht t rit} i)ciiliolt^{is n.t:i in i:tir.i:ri.rk, lrrC lir.- High} CourL can in lerlcre.

¶89

I{avir-rg lcgarcl tr-. llte irlrovc. ti.rc inlpLrgr''}e(l orclr'r is st-r asidc and tile mrittcr is rcr.lrrncit:tl biic k io tl-rt- r,rLithoritics; concelned 1br taking ir-rto consicleration t1'rc objcclions oi LI-rc petitioner Society and passing necessal'l'orders dul1, raking rttto consideration the G.O.Ms.No.268 and^{G.O.Ms.No.6,Animal} Husbandry, Dairy Development^{& Fisheries (V&F) Department'} dated 24.03.2016.

¶90

Accordingly,^{W P' No 6186 o{ 2022 is allowedto the extent} indicateci^above'

¶91

Llaving^{regard tothe order Passed in W'PNo 61 86 of} 2022,^{therelicf sought ;t"' i11 \v P No l3609 ol 2022 ci:r'trnol irt-} grantecl^{lor thc llrescttt rlllcl lllr: samc is alccorciinglvdislrirsscrl'} Mrsccllar-rcotts^{ptltiliot.ts llcr-'clillq'ii llrlr''siliLll st'lrlcl}

¶92

closed.^{Tiltrc slli'ril bc t.ro orcic'":lsio cosls'}

¶93

¶94

ASSISSD/^{.T.TIRUTANT R MALAEGISTDEVI R} R I/TRUE^COPYII sEcrrolvCo^FFICER

¶95

To,

¶96

1rffilffsrsff#'**l'

¶97

,ilIFE-r..-'r-= .. -_r-'--* _ 6. The Tahsildar, Kuntala Nlandel, Nirmal District. I 9n"^{CC ro Sri T Vishnure;a,} novocaie-iOiijCf 8 OneCCtoSri D.L p e rwo ccs to Gp r". ,,ll!-Y: l9Y9cale^[oPUC] \ snerres' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyclerabad [oUTt lO Two CCs to bp for Rr ttyoeralao" [6rrj' ^"uunue'^{High court for} the State of relangana at r i. I wo CCs to Gp for Ar ," ]ur"1ognu^{,t Hyd;;;;::i![usbandrvHish court ror the Srateor} rz. r wo CCs to Gp for lrri . " l.lu1o9nu^{,, nro",rl33ti&ildcAD, Hish court for the Stateof} rs..l.wo CCs to Gp for Ho -me' High Court for the State of Telangana at .,^{Hyderabadlour.l} 1{ ffi^{33 f";H} -amsopar Rao, sc (oPuc) I o. ene Spare Copy CKY MMA cS'

I !

HIGH COURT

DATED :1810412022

He S TA Ir:
,t
5
ri) I E JUN 202? ,5o

S PAT

¶102

¶103

COMMON ORDER

¶104

WP.Nos.6186 AND 13609 ot 2022

¶105

ALLOWING THE WP No.6186 of 2022 AND DISMISSING THE WP No.13609 ot 2022 WITHOUT COSTS

¶106

"w
=
o

The Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited. v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited. v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sai Leela Homes Plot Owners Welfare Association, (Regd. No.405/2019) Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Smt. Pendem Narayanamma Vs Sri Rv Karnan

Ravuri Jenna Reddy and 4 others Vs Shri Rajeevgandhi Hanumanthu I.A.S and another

P. Kishore Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Bollagani Nageswar Rao, And 3 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Smt. P.Vimala Devi, Warangal Dist and Another Vs Registrar, Nit, Warangal and 3 Others