Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 and interim applications under Section 151 CPC raising grievances regarding temple construction and police summons. The writ petition was withdrawn on hearing on the pretext that the matter was compromised, leading to its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 7270 OF 2020
Between:
Karnati Pichi Reddy, S/o. Late. Ram Reddy aged about 65 yeirs, Occ. Agriculture Rl/o. H. No. 1-89, Mellacheruvu Village and Mandal, Suryapet District, Telangana.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Arlicle 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit d therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or dire ion more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent in RC No. C/1363/2018 dated 13-03-2020 is withoutjurisdiction, authority and also the action of 2nd respondent in not considering the representation made by tiepetitioner and villagers daied 27-1'l-2019 and also the action of 1Oth respondent in summoning the petitioner and making him to sit in the police station hours together even in the COV l D-19 lockdown situation and the action of 6th respondent ingoing ahead with the illegal construction of temple removing the choultry against the
wish of the donors as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and con;equently set aside the orderspassed by the 3rd respondent in RC No. C/136,1/201 B dated 1310312020 and direct the 2nd respondent to considered the representation made by the petitioner and villagers daled 2711112019 and also dirr:ct the 1Oth respondent not to harass the petitioner by summoning the petitioner and also direct the 6th respondent not to make any illegal construction unde- the guise of Lord Sri Rama Temple'ffithout obtaining any permission from the local body and to pass.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may t,e pleased to direct the 1Oth respondent not to harass the petitioner by surnmoning the petitioner under the guise of proceedings bide RC No. C/1 36I,/2018 dated 1310312020 issued by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of thr:, above writ petition and to pass
lA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may t,e pleased to suspend the proceedings vide RC. No. C/1 363/2018 dated 13lO3l2O.?.0 passed by the 3rd rerspondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and t: pass
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel forthe Respondent No 1 to 5: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel forthe Respondent No. 6: MULLANGI RAMI REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.7 to 10: GP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No. 11: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THEIION'BLE SRI JUSTICEA'ABHISHEKREDDY
WRITPETITIONNo,727Oof 2020
ORDER:
Whenthematteristakenupforhearing,sriB.Madhusudhan Rao, iearnedcounselfor the petitioner' has sought permissionof the Court towithdrawthe Writ Petitionon the pretext lhat the matter Hc alsomadean has beencompromised betweenthe partles' endorsementon the Writ Petition to that effcct'
Therefore,the Writ Petitionis dismissed as rvithdrau'n'
Miscellaneouspetitions pending'if any' shall standclosed'
1
There shallbe no order as to costs'
SD/-T.KRISHNAKUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR I
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
SDR GJP
HIGH COURT DATE D:27 10412022
r\ <r'
.tz
f caI,
o) c-
U rf.4. ,t
Fx/
o
\i- sa
a
,:) il a
ORDEiR
WP.Nrc.7270 of 2020
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
ll\ l---'
Karnati Pichi Reddy
State of Telangana
N. Konda Reddy
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
