The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 7204 of 2019 for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear despite listings for dismissal under the caption.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3256 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisd iction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEI\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 7204 OF 2019
Between:
AND
R5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 1010212022 in l.A. No. 2/2019
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not paying the compensation amount to the petitioner herein connection with the petitioners father land situated in Sy.No.17lA to an extent of Ac.3.33 guntas and land in Jagannadhapuram Village of Sattupalli mandal,Khammam District in spite of Representation dated.02.03.2019 is illegal and void and opposed to Articles 14,19,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents No.1 and 3 to pay the compensation amounts of the petitioners father land in question to the petitioner herein
IANO:1OF2 019
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supl>ort of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondenis .no.1 to 3 not to pay the compensation amount to the 4th respondent in respect of the compensation amount of the rand in s.y.No..r7lA to an extent of Ac.3.33 guntas situated at Jagannadhapuram viflage of sattupaIi Mandar in Khammam District, pending disposal of re marn writ petition
lA NO: 3 OF 201 9:
Between:
M:i?it1rtlo'Y;rffigpflion"d43 years,R/o.JagannadhapuramViilase,sattenapaily
AND ....|MPLEAD RESPONDENT
Petition under S';ctron i51 cpc praying that in the circumstances ;L::::Xffl* affidavit fired in suppo. of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the lnterim Orders passed l.A No 1 ot 2019 in the WP NO. 7204 of 2019 dt 04-0420.19 in interest of justice
counsel for the petitioners: sRr MANGLAMPALLT BHASKAR (Nor PRESENT)
counsel for Responde'rt Nos. 1 to 3: Gp FoR LAND AceursriloN
Counsel for Responderrt No, 5: SRI p. V. RAMANA
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINDNI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PDTITION No.72O4 of 2OL9
ORDER:
This matter was listed before this Court on \5.12.2022, but thcre was no representation for the petitioners. In view of the same, the matter was directed to be listed on 20.12.2022 under the same caption,for dismissal,. In spite of listing the matter under the caption Tor dismissal,, there is no representation for the petitioners either in the morning session or in the afternoon session. Hence, it appears that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the matter.
2' In the circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions,
if any, pending in this writ petition shail stand closed.
SD/- P. PADMANABHA DDY ASSISTANT REG TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2011212022
l tlE Sl4
(
,( '<i
3 :) 24 0EC7[?2
c7-
7.
ORDER
WP.No.7204 ot 2O19
/2---<br>(7
wY
/,,' il
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR
NON.PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS
Smt Sattenapalli Padma
The State of Telangana
Justice Mummindni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
