Petitioners withdrew the writ petition challenging a Revenue Divisional Officer's order. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3256 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Between:
WRIT PETITIO N NO: 6928 oF 2018
All are R/o.H.No.S-24-gt 1 l 1 / A,. prakasarr pantulu Nagar, Galularamaram, Quthbullahpur [.4andat, R.R.Disirjct.
RR 5 to 7 brouqht on record as Lrs_ of the deceased RespondentNo. 4 as per c.o. dt. 19t10t2o22 in LA. No. lizoiz.- ---wevv'! lvevv,
Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of tndia orrilnt:i:i?.=[: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue'a writ or order more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the orders of the 2nd respondent in case No.F113096/16, dated 711 2017 dismissing the appear fired by the petitioners under sec.24 of A P (T A) Aborition of rnams Act, 1955, confirming the orders passed by the 3rd
respondent Case No.L/560212015, daled11.4.2016 underthe provisionsof Abolition of lnanrs Act, 1955granting Occupancy RightsCertificatein favor of the 4th respondent herein as illegal, arbitraryand contraryto the provisionsof the A.P.(T.A) Abolition of lnams Act, 1955 and set asidethe same
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstate d in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the orderspassed bythe 3rd respondentin Case No.L/5602/2015. dated1 1.4 2016,pendingdisposal of the abovewrit petition
lA NO: 2 OF 2022:
Between:
AND
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleased to
vacate the order dated 02-03-2018 passed in W.P. No. 6928 of 2018 and dismiss the Writ Petition as devoid of nrerits, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. VENKAT REDDY, COUNSEL FOR SRI V CH NAIDU
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7: SRI D. VIJAY KUMAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.692 8 of2O18
ORDER:
Sri K.Venkat Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri V.Ch.Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ petition.
Miscellaneous petitir>ns, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed_ There shall be no order as to costs
SD/-R.KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (a
SECTiON OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri V Ch Naidu Advocate [OpUC] 2. Two CCs to GP For Revenue,. High C.o_qt fqi the State of Tetangana. [OUT] 9. 9ne Q9to D. Vijay Kumar,Advo6are(OpuC) 4. Two CD Copies h/BC ..4,,,-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2011212022
'! q. ETAT|
.)
r-: ?u
tr utt
ORDER
WP.No.6928 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
1)'
Talari Laxmamma
Talari Yadagiri
Talari Narsing Rao
State of Telangana
Joint Collector, Malkajgiri-Hedchal District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Malkajgiri Division
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
