Disposed

Fishermen Cooperative Society v. State of Telangana and 4 Others

Telangana HC26 Apr 2022WP/646/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking mandamus to evaluate water spread area of a fish tank. Court directed petitioner to submit fresh representation for consideration by the Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Irrigation within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit fresh representation to Respondent No. 2 for evaluation of water spread area.

Fishermen Cooperative Society Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY^{SIXTH DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE A.ABHISHEKREDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO^'.646 0F²⁰²¹

¶6

Between:

¶7

Fishermen Cooperative^{Society, Gokaram, Valigonda} .Mandal,^Yadadri gfruvanaoiri District Represent-ed by C.Danaiah (lr'4ember of the^S-tVlen cor.iti#l 5/o Lrtchairn,^{Aged a6out 52 years,RJo Gokaram Village'} Valigonda lr,4andal, Yadadri^{Bhuvanagiri District}

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

State of Telangana,^{Represented by its Principalsecretary.to} ,Government, Department of Animal^{Husbandryand Fisheries, at Secretariat, Hyderabad}

¶11

State of Telangana,^{Representedby its PrincipaiSecretary. to} .GPYeTIT1I Department of lrrigatiori^{JnJ b-o-mrianOArea'Development,at Secretariat,} Hyderabad

¶12

The Commissioner^{of Fisheries, Shantinagar,Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad}

¶13

The suoerintending^{Engineer, Deparlmentof lnigation and commandArea} Develodment, Yadadri^{Bhuvanagiri District}

¶14

The District Fisheries^{Officer' Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article^{226 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High courtmaybe} pleased to issue a writ or writs, order^{or Direction, more particularly one in the} nature of Writ of lvlandamus,^{declaringthe action of respondentsin not taking} action on the representations^{of the petitioner, includingthe representationdated} 11lgt2o2o in order to^{evaluate the water spread area available as on date in the} existing Ramasamudram^{cheruvu(Tank) of GokaramVillage, Valigonda Mandal,} Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District,^{as bad,arbitrary, contraryto all cannonsof law and} also offends Arts. 14,^{19 and21 of the Constitutionof lndia'}

¶17

¶18

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶19

Petition under Section^{151 CPC prayingthatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} order to implead^{the proposed Respondents hereinas RespondentNos 6 to B in} the above Writ^{Petition i.e. W.P.No.646 ot 2021 andI A No l of 2021'}

¶20

IA NO: 1 0F 2021

¶21

PetitionundersectionlslCPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} issue interim^{directions to the Respondentsto forthwith initiate action (by way of} an enquiry) to^{evaluatethe water spreadarea available as on date in the existing} RamasamudramCheruvu(Tank)ofGokaramVillage,ValigondaMandal'Yadadri BhuvanagiriDistricr,byconsideringtherepresentationofpetitionerdated 11tglz)2} for the^{welfareof the membersof the society'}

¶22

Counsel for the^{Petitioner : SRl. M VIDYAVATHI}

¶23

Counsel forthe^{Respondents1 ,3 and 5 : GP FOR FISHERIES}

¶24

Counsel for the^{Respondents2 and 4 :GP FOR IRRIGATION}

¶25

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

¶26

¶27

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE A. ABTIISHEKREDDY} PETTTION^No.646of202t

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Aggrieved by^{the action of the respondents in not} considering^{the representationsof the petitioner includingthe} representation^{dated l1'09'2020in order to evaluate the water} spread area^{available as on datein the existingRamasamudram} Cheruvu^{(Tank) of Gokaram Village' ValigondaMandal'} Yadadri^{Bhuvanagiri District, the petitioner has filed the} present Writ^Petition.

¶30

Having^{regard to the nature of grievanceof the} petitioner,^{without going into the merits or demerits of the} case, this^{writ Petition is disposed of directingthe petitionerto} submit a^{fresh representationto the respondentNo'2 -} Principal^{Secretary to Govemment, Department of Irrigation&} Command^{Area Development, Hyderabad'so as to evaluate} the water^{spread areaavailablein the existingRamasamudram}

¶31

¶32

AAR, J w.P.No.646 of 2021

¶33

¶34

Cheruvu (I'ank) of Gokaram Village, Valigonda Mandal,

¶35

Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, within a period of two (2) weeks

¶36

from toda1,. On sucl.r representation being rnade, the

¶37

respondent No.2 shall consider the said representatior.r of tl.re petitioner and pass necessary orders, strictly iu accordance

¶38

with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a

¶39

period ofeight (8) weeks from the date ofreceipt thereof.

¶40

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

¶41

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶42

SD/-P.PADMANABHA^REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I /:_ L-v\

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Principal Secretary^{to Government, Department of Animal Husbandryand} ' iiti'iii".,'slaG of Tel6ngana, at Secretariat, Hvderabad

¶47

¶48

1. The Principal^{Secretary to Government, Departmentof lrrigationand} - c""rrino"Are-a oevetopment, state of Telangana, at secretariat. Hyderabad

¶49

The commissioner^{of Fisheries,shantinagar, Vijayanagar colony,Hyderabad}

¶50

The Superintending^{Engineer, Departmentof lnigation and Command Area} Development,^{Yadadri Bhuvanagiri Dtslrtct}

¶51

The District^{Fisheries Officer,Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District}

¶52

One CC to^{SRl. M VIDYAVATHI, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶53

T,TwoCCstoGPFoRF|SHER|ES,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana,At Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶54

Two CD^Copies

¶55

One SPare^CoPY.

¶56

SW NY

HIGH COURT

DATE D :2 610412022

ORDER

€
t
q
16 lul{ 't0?l a. I
,a' ...
* oEsPAic 'l
t!

¶61

WP.No.646 of²⁰²¹

¶62

DISPOSING OF^{THE WRIT PETITION}

¶63

WITHOUT COSTS

Fishermen Cooperative Society v. State of Telangana and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fishermen Cooperative Society v. State of Telangana and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nareddy Praveen Kumar Vs Sri Amoy Kumar

Mohammed Shakeel Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana

Katragadda Padmavathi Vs Sri.Saidulu

Velicheti Sai Baba Vs The Union of India

Bollepelly Venkatesh Vs The State of Telangana

Punem Koteswera Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 8 others