Special Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana disposed of a writ petition challenging non-selection for a copyist post as infructuous, without costs, after counsel accepted the petition was no longer maintainable.
Petition disposed of as infructuous. No interim appointment directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6410 OF 2021
Between:
M. Sirisha, W/o. Mr.Venkataramana Rao., D/o.late M.Sathyanarayana Aged37years, Occupation- Unemployed. R/o- 15-'138/545, Flat no- 201,ll floorAdarsha Apartments, NBE Colony, Meerpet, Balapur, Rangareddy-500097.
...pETtTtoNER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue Writ Order or Orders moreparticularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents 1 and 2 in not selecting Petitioner for the post of copyist or to any other suitablepost, TypisVCopyistpursuing to Notification(9) Nos.1/2019-RC, dated 311O712019 as amounting to highly arbitrary, illegal and u n co n stitutio n a I
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondent No.1 to appoint the Petitioner in any suitablepost in the District of Nalgonda or any other place pending final disposal of the main writpetition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GOPALA KRISHNA KALANIDHI
Counsel for Respondents: SRI N. PRAVEEN REDDY
(sc FoR TS HC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CIIANDRA STIARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.641O of 2O2l
ORI)ER, 1P- rr," Hon'ble the chief Jusnce sritrh chand.o shorrlrat
Learned counsel for the petitioner is fair enough in stzrting before this Court that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/.B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGIS
//TRUE COPYII
{ SEC'TION OFFICER
To
IMBC GJPw
HIGH COURT DATED: 2610412022
ORDER
WP.No.6410 of 2021
'::'::::
s9 5,1AT f. 11 \r
1 t',>'<br>,.,.
I
{T Ttl 1$[t
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
5.qp("o RJ\6<sup>s\o
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the non-seleciton for a post of copyist still subsides?
What is the proper disposal when the court finds the writ petition infructuous?
Whether interim appointment in a suitable post can be directed pending final disposal?
M. Sirisha
Registrar (Recruitment), High Court for The State of Telangana
Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nalgonda
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
