The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the non-registration of sale deed documents by the Sub-Registrar. The court directed the Respondent to accept the document for registration.
Direction to Respondent No. 4 to accept the document presented by the petitioner for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TENTHDAYOF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE B.VIJAYSENREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:5919oF 2022
Betwee n:
SunkariRamesh.s/oLateKotaiah,agedabout42-yeals'occ.BusineSS,R/o il.N;. i-b-?3, Brr'agatsingnNigir cnintatacheruvu,-Bechragl'4adaramvillage' Suryapet MandalDistrict,TS
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petitionunder Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith' the High Court maybe pleased topass an orderor direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ Mandamusto declare the action of the Respondent No 4' in not receive'process' register,sale deed documents presentedby the Petitioner in favor of the prospectivepurchaser of the Petitioners land in Sy No l68/AA33/3/1 and Sy' No' 168/AA33/3to a total extent of land Ac 0 1825 gts ' situatedat Chinta lache ruvu' BechragNladaramvillage' is iltegal against the 71 of Registration Act 1908' and againstthe Article14' 19' 21 ai :oo-n Constitutionof lndia and consequently directthe RespondentNo 4 to receive' process' register andreleasethe sale deeddocumentsin favor of the prospective purchasers and in the land of petitioner in Sy.No. 168/AA33/3/1and sy No.168i AA33/3 to a totalextentof landAc.0 1825 gts 'situatedat Chintala cheruvu 'Bech rag lr'4adararn village' SuryapetN4andal and Districtforthwith
.-.-.-r4
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighcourtmaybepleasedto direct theRespondentNo.4 to receive' process' register and release the sale deed documentsin favor of the prospective purchasersand in the landof Petitioner in Sy.No. 168/AA33/3/1and Sy No l68/4A33/3 to a totalextentof land Ac.0.1825gts., situated at Chintalacheruvu' BechragMadaramvillage' Suryapet Mandaland District pendingdisposal of the main writ petition'
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRI J' RAGHURAM
Counsel for the Respondents:AGPFOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
W.P.No.5919 OF 2022
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
4 The writpetition is, accordingly,disposed of. No costs. 5 Pending miscellaneouspetitions, if any, shallstand closed
SD/.K.ONESIM
\
ASSISTANT6GISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
To, sEcIoN OFFTCER
' I!:,.3,:?,:i3',ir:|,!:'3?'r:3#lHio5..3;",1'"DepartmentState ot reransana
' I?3"r:3$Bltionerand lnspector Generalstamps and Resislrations,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010312022
ORDER
WP.No.5919 of 2022
f,i,?i8:,T 3 oT#u wR I r PE nfl o N
1 \0 7Z t '\ )-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Sub-Registrar's refusal to register a sale deed document was illegal and arbitrary violating constitutional provisions.
Whether a direction should be issued to the Respondent to accept the document for registration.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sunkari Ramesh
State of Telangana
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
