The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus declaring the interference by respondent No.4 over private patty land arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights. The petition was withdrawn with the court's permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SEVENTHDAYOF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSENREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 29010 OF 2017
Between:
Sriram Shankarawa,, W/o Yadaiah,Aged about50 yea rs, Occ: Agriculture, F/o Vaddepalli Village, Doulatabad Mandal,SiddipetDist rict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 olthe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith, the High court may be pleasedto issue an appropriate writ, orderor direction more particularlyone in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the respondent No.4 in interferingwith the rights of thepetitioner over theland in an extent of Ac.1.00 guntas in sy.No.636/1/A and Ac.0.38guntas in Sy.No.622142of Vaddepalli Village fields, Doulatabad Mandal, siddipet District stating thatthe same is requiredfor constructionof Double Bed- Room House Scheme for weaker sectionpeople by the respondent No.1 eventhough the same isprivatepatty land, without acquiring the same or following the due procedure of law aS arbitrary, illegal, colorable exerciseof power and in utter violation of theprinciples of naturaljustice and well establishedlegalprinciplesapart from being violative of fundamentalrights guaranteedto the petilioner under Articles '14, 19, 2,1 and 300-4 of the constitutionof lndia and consequentlydirect the respondents No.3 & 4 not to interfere withthe rights of the petitioner over the land in an extent of Ac.1.00guntas in sy.No.636/1/Aand Ac.0.38 guntasin sy.No.622lA2 of Vaddepalli Village fields, Doulatabad Mandal,siddipet Districtwithout following due procedureof law.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP.NO: 36085 OF 20 17</sup>
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High courtrnaybe pleased to directthe respondents not to interfere withthe rights of the petitioner overthe land in an extent of Ac.1.00guntas inSy.No.636/1/Aand Ac.0 38 guntas in Sy.No622lA2of
/
Vaddepalli Villagefields, )oulatabad Mandal,siddipet District without followingdue procedureoflaw,pendingdisposalofthewritpetitionintheinterestofjustice, t
Counsel for the Petitione':SRI PAMBALIRAMESH
Counsel for theResponcents: GPFOR REVENUE(TG)
The Court madethe follc ring: ORDER
I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
{
\I'.P.No.29010 OF 2017
ORDER:
Leamed counsel for the peritioner seel$ permission to
withdraw the writ petition and to that effect, Ietter dated 2g.0L.2022
has been filed in the Registry.
Permission as sought for is accorded.
Accordingly, the !7rit Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
Mscellaneous petitions, lf any, pending shall stand
closed.
SD/.P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ll ..
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
1.. One CC to SRI PAMBALI RAMESH Advocate [OPUC]
HIGH COURT
DATED:07102120 22
ORDER
1r''c_ > lA'€ o
I !r 16 itB 2022
WP.No.29010 of 2017
DISMTSSING TI- E WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAVI/ N WITHOUT COSTS.
\ ul
t$1
)4--
\o
Sriram Shankarawa
State of Telangana
District Collector, Siddipet District
Revenue Divisional Officer
Tahasildar, Doulatabad Mandal
B. Vijayasan Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
