The Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal's order rejecting a claim for promotion to Assistant Director of Agriculture on par with a junior, noting the delay in passing the departmental test.
Writ petition dismissed with no costs and pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33r81
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5044 OF 2011
Between:
G. Ramesh, S/o. Lakshmaiah, aged 57 yrs, Occ:Agriculture Officer, Devarakonda, Nalgonda, O/o. The Assistant Director of Agriculture(R) Devarakonda, Nalgonda District, H.No.2-17-39, SBH Colony, Opp: Survey of lndia, Uppal, Hyderabad-39.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a lvrit or order or direction rnore particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in its order dated 29-10-2010 in O.A.No, 373412010 wlth M.A.No.1996/2010 in rejecting the claim of the applicant for prcmotion to the cadre of Assistant Director of Agriculture on par with his Juniors as iilegal, arbitrary and violative of A(icle 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently qtrash and set aside the same and declare that the petiiioner is entitled for promotion as Assistant Director of Agriculture on par with hls.tuniors with all consequential benefits such as seniority, pay and allowances, etc., !n the interest ofjustice.
l.A. NO: 1. OF 2011(WPlllP. NO: 6239 OF 201{)
Petition under S€ction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in srpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix en early date for hearinry of the main writ petition in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. A RAGHU KUMAR
Counsel for the Resporrdents: GP FOR SERVICES-II
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAI{D I('MAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAP'U RAJESIIWAR RAO
Writ Petition No.5O44 of 2O11
ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Justice Abhinond Kumar Shauili) This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner under Article-226 of the Constitution of India seeking a 'Writ of certiorari' by ca,lling lor records relating to the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, in O.A.No. 3734 of 201O along with M.A.No.1996 of 2010, dated 29.lO.2OlO; and to quash the same.
AKs,J A RRN,J wp_5o44_2O11
2
junior.by name Mr. B. Krishnaiah rvas promoted as Agriculture Officer in December, 2OOl; tJle petitioner coulci not pal;s the departmenta-l test and thegrievance of the petiti<,ner is that hisjunior ItIr. B. Ikishnaiah was promote d as Assistant Director ignoring the case of the pe,jtioner; aggrieveci by the action of respondents in not promoting the petitioner &.:q Assistant D:.rector on p€u' with his jurrior, petitioner approached the Tribunal; by filing O.A.No.3734 of 2O10; and Ure Tribuna-l has dismissed the O.A.No.3734 of 2OLO, ride orders dated 29.1O.2O1O without appreciatin6g any of the contentions raised by the petitioner.
AKS,J & NRR,J wp_ 5044_2O11
3
-7
petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Director on par with hisjunror ub; Mr.B. Krishnaiah.
AK5,] & NRR,J wp_ 5044_2O11
4
within the stipulated time. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to irrt-erfere with the order passed by the
Tribuna-I.
if any in this 'Vrit Petition, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/€.SIREESHA ASSI!JTANT REGISTRAR Go
SECTION OFFICER
To,
KAR
SW
Hr
HIGH COURT
DATED:281'1012022
ORDER
W.P.No.5044 o1'2011
/,: 1'; i'-- r€:
1_) 2 0 ,tlt{ ?[t3 H
+l
,:' *
DISMISSING OI; THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COS TS
cd4 {ril"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Tribunal's order dismissing the petitioner's claim for promotion on par with his junior on grounds of belatedly passing the departmental test.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
nullReferred
null
2 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Ramesh
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Shavili
Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
