A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus was dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner and respondent counsel were absent from the hearing, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
None. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
ts318 l
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 23497 OF 2007
Between:
The Chief Executive Officer, Ztlla Parishad, R.R. District, Hyderabad
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the orders passed by the A P.A.T in O.A. No. 423912003 dated.31-08-2007 is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, unreasonable and violative of G.O.Ms. No. 128 dated 1-6-2007 and violation of Rule 20 of CCA Rules and set aside the same.
LA. NO: 1OF 2OO7 WPMP. NO: 30621 OF 2007 )
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Suspend the operation of the orders passed in O.A.No. 423gt2OO3 dated.31-08-2007 pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. ELISHA (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents No.2 & 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (Nor PRESENT) The court made the fottowing: oRDER
HON'BLE SRr JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLt AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESIIWAR RAO
W.P.No.23497 OF 2007
ORDER (Pat lloa'ble Sti lustice Abhinan<i Kunar Shavili)
Or 18.10.2022, none appeared and there was no
representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal". Today also, rvhen the matter is taken up for hearing, none appears and there is no representation on behalf of thc petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecLlting the matter.
Flence, the Writ Petiticn is dismissed for
non-prosecution. No costs.
Miscellanious petitions, if any, pcnding shall stand
cIosed. SD/. N. CHANDRASE AR RAO ASSIST ISTRAR
//TRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
I
To I ?'13 33.'if3f?ot*''3l'0.tiv"i?'Al3?'31o'- DEV' Hish court ror the , ai".t l"t at T 0 ::i++xft l*^t9lJA,Adv o ca tet o P u c I
1 1
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2711012022
ORDER
WP.No.23497 of 2007
'dE. STrl
(
of,
r-) 2B BEI 7W
,".
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON-PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
+.4e& \4iffi''u
Chief Executive Officer, Ztlla Parishad, R.R. District, Hyderabad
B. Shravan Kumar
State of A.P.
Commissioner of Panchayat Raj And Rural Development, Hyderabad
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
