The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the exclusion of upper age limits for SC/ST/PwD candidates in Civil Judges recruitment, noting the petitioner could not qualify despite interim orders.
The petition seeking a declaration against the recruitment notification was dismissed as the petitioner did not qualify.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAYOF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEP NAVEENRAO AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO
,/
WRIT PETITION NO: 4443 OF2011
Between:
K.T.Royal, s/o. Mattaiah, Occ: Advocate,R/o. H.no.'19-1 166 Vinobnagar, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lt/andamus declaring the action of the'1 st respondent issued Notification No. 29 / 2011-RC Dt: 25.01 .2011 for appointment in the category Civil Judges ( Junior Division )not considering the upper age limits to the schedule castes on per with schedule Tribes and Physically Handicapped Candidates as illegal, arbitrary, unsustainable and violative of Article 14, 1 6 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and well established principles of natural justice in the interest ofjustice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 5501 OF 201't)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to receive application of petitioner for appearing the screening written examination pending disposal of the above WP.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS_-. Counsel forthe Respondent: Y RAMA RAO (SC FOR APHC) /' The Cour.t made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEl\ RAO
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICtr.], SRIIENI'-A.S FAO
W.P. No.4443 of 2Ol1
ORDER: (ne. H, n ble Sri Justice P Naveen Rao)
Heard Ie rrned standing counsel for first resporu tent Sri Y Rama
Rao. No repres :ntation for petitioner.
.... to issue appropriate writ order or direction mor'e partLlruly ,rne ln the llature of \vrit o M,uldarnus declartrg the action of the lst resf,ondent ssLled l,Iotilication No 29 / 20ll-:C Dt 25 0l 2011 for appointment in the category C,vil Judjies Junior Division not cor sidering the upper age limits to the schedulc c..stes on oar $atlr schedule 'lribes aJrd Ph,, iicirlly Handicapped Carndidatcs as illegal arlJitrary uxsLlstajlable and violaEve of Artlc r 14 16and21of the Constitution of India and lvell est,-bl; ihcd pnnclples of [aturalj ustjcr in the interesr ofjustice and pass.....
SD/-N.CHANIIRASEKHARRAO ASSIS'TANIREGISTRAR /trRUE coPY" sEc(ieNoFFtcER
To,
PSR
'(--
HIGH COUF T
DATED:0811112022
ORDER
WP.No. 4441OF 2011
-1: _s
o.<br>it:" ir
rl
t::I
r t\li
{) ?iu? I
[5
[' i:
{.\ , .,/
DISMISSED I)F THE WP WITHOUT CC STS
4.{&E
L, .t>'
K.T.Royal
The Registrar ( Recruitment ), High court of Andhra Pradesh At Hyderabad
The Law Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat at Hyderabad
P NAVEENRAO
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
