Writ petition challenging rejection of District Judge admission test hall ticket dismissed as infructuous since cause no longer survives.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 29369 OF 20'17
Between:
Palakurthi Kiran, S/o. Sunrender Rao, Aged. 39 Years, Occ. Advocate R/o. Flat No. 302, Sai Laxmi Residency, Plot No.678 amp 679, Prasanth Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad - 70
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents more particularly 3 rd respondent in rejecting my application for appearing the written test for the post of District Judge (Entry Level) -2017 vide ROC no.21312Q17-RC Dl:4l1l17 without assigning anyjustified reasons and without verifying the records is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently direct the respondents to issue Hall Ticket to the petitioner for attending the written test of above Examination in the interest ofjustice
l.A. NO: 1 OF 20f i PMP. NO: 36549 OF 2017
Petition und :r Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the c irr::u1'11512n""r stated in the affidavit filed Lr support of the petition, the High Corrrt may be pleased to direct the responc ents to issue Hall Ticket to the petiticnerr fro appearing the written examinatio r test for the post of District Judge (Errt'y Level)- 2017 vide ROC No. 2131 2017-RC dt. 4l\l 17 as schedule to be helc on 1Oth September, 2017 or any other subsequent date pending disposal of \V P. n the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Pe litioner: SRl. G ANIL KIRAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Re;pondents: SWAROOP OORILLA (SC FORTAPHC) Counsel for the Re:pondents: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION The Court made th r following: ORDER
I
I
HONtsLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREtrNIVAS RAO
W.P. No. 29369 of 2077
ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice P Naveen Rao)
Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that cause in the writ petition does not survive and writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
No costs. Misceilaneous applications, if any pending stand closed.
SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Cfr
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1. One CC to SRl. G ANIL KIRAN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRl. SWAROOP OORILLA (SC FORTAPHC), [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, High Cqurt for the State ofTelangana At Hyderabad. [OUTI 4. Two CD Copies
GK GJP Bh
HIGH COUF T
DATED:081' 112022
ORDER
WP.No.29369 of 2017
\t: STqT^
(
a<
c_
1 t, llil 2t23
2,
{= ;:,1r''lt<br>
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUC:'UOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Icrru>
gsh q 1,1,"
Palakurthi Kiran
The State Of Telangana
The High Court of Judicature For the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh
The High Court of Judicature For the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh
P NAVEEN RAO
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
