High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging promotion as infructuous because impugned orders were rendered null by the retirement of unofficial respondents during pendency.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous leaving question of law open to be adjudicated in identical cases. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 43153 OF 2015
Between:
M.Latha D/o M.Balaraju, Aged 45years, O/o Commissioner of Sericulture, Rd.No.72, Prashasan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, R/o. Hyderabad.
...Petitioner/3rd Party
AND
... Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ and after calling for the records in O.A.No.4535 of 2015, dated: 14.10.2015 on the file of the Hon'ble APAT, Hyderabad quash the same.
l.A. NO: 3 OF 201S(WPM P .NO: 5 56 22 0F 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the order dated 14-10-2015 in O.A.No.4535 of 2015.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. K. UDAYA SRI
Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES - ll
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
Writ Petition No.43153 of 2O15
ORDER: (Per Hon'bte Justtce Abhinand Kumar ShauiLi)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned
counsel for the petitioner has informed the Court that petitioner herein has challenged the promotion of unofficial respondents; and during pendency of the present writ petition, the unofficial respondents had attained the age of superannuation and retired lrom service thus rendering the present w-rit petition as 'infructuous'.
any in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
\
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI DEPU REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI N OFFICER
To, '1. One CC to Smt K. Udaya Sri Advocate tOpUCl 2 Two ccs to Gp for seriices-fl, n,gh b-ofi f6r-the State of rerangana at Hyderabad. IOUTT 3. Trjvo CD Coriies 4. One Spare boov CHR bs
?
HIGH COURT
DATED:2510712022
ORDER
W.P.No.43153 of 2015
_rt.
1 c
.:)':!L
\
il.|1
uLt ?Bn
L<br>L)
.<:
-(
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
q}c"t'q l'v
M.Latha
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Sericulture
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
N.V. Shrvan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
