High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.16844 of 2008. Earlier conditional order dated 24.03.2015 granting time for payment was not complied with by the petitioner. The court dismissed the petition for non-compliance.
None. The writ petition is dismissed for failure to comply with a conditional order to pay Batta.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 16844 OF 2008
Between:
,..PETITIONERS
AND
l
l j
(RR 7 to 20 ir pleaded as per Court Order, datedl2 .12.20(tB in W.P.M.P. No.34287 of I r0B)
...RESPONDENTS Petition undr 'Article 226 of the Constitution of lndi;t ora'ying that in the circumstances stat, d in the affidavit filed therewith. the High Court may be pleased to issue ap ropriale Writ or order or direction prefererbly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari alling for the records in O.A.No.8266 of t2005 ,lt 5-1 1-2007 on the file of the Hon' le A.P. Administrative Tribunal at Hyde|abad and quash the same as it is vio rtive of presidential orders as well a; art. 371-D of the Constitution of lnd i; and consequently direct the respondents to cc,nsider the case of the petitioners.
3
I i
/
,
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2008(WPM P. NO: 21867 OF 2008)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment in O.A.No.8266 of 2005 dt 5.11.2007, on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: s OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 36508 OF 2008)
Between:
...Petitioners/Proposed lmplead Respondents
-v
.+
AND
...Res;r,rn derrts/Petitioners
(RR - 11 to 16 not necessary)
...Respon dc nts/Respondents
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r:ircurrstances stated in the affidavit filed in s rpport of the petition, the High court may be l;leased to limit the suspension orde passed in W.P.M.P.No.21867 12OOB in W.p.No.168 44t2OO8
5
/
dated 1-8-2008, in so far as the Multi Zone No.lll is concerned, so as to enable the 5th Respondent for effectingpromotions in Multi Zone-l & ll without keeping the posts, reserving and by following the Note-3 of the Rule-lll of G.O.Ms.No.245, dated 8-5-2002.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. G.V.L. MURHW
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: NONE APPEARED
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6: GP FOR SERVICES ll
Counsel.for the Respondent Nos.7 to 20: SRl. N. GURU GOPAL
The Court made the following: ORDER
I i
!
I
THE HON'] LE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND K'UMT,[I||;HIIVILI
AND
THE HO J'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRA'YAN ,i(I.'MI\R
I rrit Petition No.16844 of !?OOl3
ORDER: (P,, Hon'ble Justice Abhinand Kurnar Sha uili)
When :he Writ Petition had come up 1o1'hearing
on 24.O3.2( 15, a Division Bench ol this Cor-rr': g::anted three (O3) v -'eks' time for payment of Batta along with petition anr also observed that failing which, the Writ Petition sha 1 stand automatically dismrssed. But, the said condit rnal order was not complied u'it.1 l)y the petitioner.
2, Accorc.ngly, the Registry made an endorsement stating that the conditional order of this Horrtrle Court dated 24.O! 2015 is not complied with. and the same has been gi. en effect to
AKS,J & NVSK,J wP_16644_2oo6
2
I
I \t
if any in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 4t) SECTION OFFICER
\
To, 1. One CC to SRl. G.V.L. MURHTY, Advocate IOPUCI
CHR GJPA^,-
7
HIGH COUR'
DATED:2510' 12022
ORDER
W.P.No.1684 4 of 2008
za 16E STA r;--
b*
l"(
:)t -|,
ci 12 rrl 2m a
L)
_-,
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT C( )STS
/;<br>o)
rh
ll >1.
2;>
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-compliance with a conditional order regarding payment of Batta.
Whether conditional orders passed on 24.03.2015 are complied with by the petitioner regarding payment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.No.8266 of 2005Referred¶33
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G. Narasimhulu
M. Rama Krishna Rao
G.R. Chalapathi Rao
Abhinand Kumar Shauili
N.V. Shraivan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
