B.Narasimha v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged disposal of land for road widening as illegal violation of the power of eminent domain. Court dismissed petition with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3230 ]
I
i
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY .THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 37927 OF 2022
Between
B.Narasimha, S/o.Late B.Agaiah Aged about B0 years, Occ. Business R/o.H. No.1-52l1, Madhapur Serlingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
...PETITIONER
AND
- The State of Telangana. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether respondents can dispossess petitioner from property for road widening without following statutory acquisition procedure.
Whether the impugned dispossession violates Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution.
Whether relief of injunction against dispossession should be granted pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Narasimha
- respondent
The State of Telangana
- respondent
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
- respondent
The Deputy Commissioner, Madhapur
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner of Police Madhapur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/37927/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court