Petitioner sought mandamus for demolition of illegal construction by Respondent No. 6. Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was accorded. Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No general principle established.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 37138 OF 2022
Between:
Kursam Seshu, S/o. Gopaiah, aged 30 years, Caste ST Kova Occ. Labour, R/o. Nandulachilaka Village Nadikudi Post, Dammugudem Mandal Bhadradri Kothagudem District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prqying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not demolishing the illegal constructions of multistoried building made by the unofficial respondent no.6 at Opposite to KK Function Hall, Charla Road, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri Kothagudem District without obtaining any permission from the 5th respondent, illegally making the construction of multi storied building, without considering $e notice issued by the Sth respondent dated 09.09.2021 and also representation o(
the petitioner dated .12.2021 going for construction is highly il egirl, arbitrary and against the principler of natural .justice and also violation of A-1ir;les 14, 19,21 and 300-4 of Constitutior of lndia and consequently direct the reslr,:rdents to demolish the illegal constructrc rs made by the unofficial respondent no{i imrnediately in the interest ofjustice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under lection 151 CPC praying that in the cr.r urnstances stated in the affidavit filed in st pport of the petition the High Cou't nray be p eased to direct the respondents 1 to i to demolish the illegal construction:r rrar:le kry the unofficial respondent no.6 witl out obtaining any permission from the iith respondent by making construction :f multi storied building at Opposite to(K Function Hall, Charla Road. Bhadrz :halam, Bhadradri Kothagudem ttist'irl * ithout considering the notice dated 09. I2021 issued by the Sth responderrt p,:)nd ng disposal of main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petit oner: SRI KRISHNA MARAGANI
Counsel for the Resl ondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYA'" R,AJ RURAL DEV
Counsel for the Resl rndent No. 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Restr rndent No.5: SRI C. KALYAN RAO,
SC FOR GRAM PANC{A'/AT
Counsel for the Re:s c,ndent No. 6: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the 1 )llowing: ORDER
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION No.37138 of 2022
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter
dated 27-10-2022 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, -s[all
stand dismissed.
SD/-I.NAGALAKS MI DEPUry REGIS
i/TRUE COPY// SECTION FICER
\
To,
NPJ
SB
HIGH COURT
DATED:28110 2022
:<br>o* E:\ <br>(/) L.f
I.:J t-t-,,
t- -
t-
ORDER
WP.No.37138 of 2022
DISMISSING'1 HE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRA''N WITHOUT COSTS.
c-ro-
q
xlnf>t-
5.,)
Kursam Seshu
State of Telangana
The District Collector (Panchayat Raj Wing)
The District Panchayat Officer
The Revenue Divisional officer cum Special officer for Gramapanchayath
Bhadrachalam Grampanchayat
LA LTEH KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
