The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by Dr. Kiran Kumar seeking quashing of a termination order and directions for reinstatement as infructuous when it was no longer suitable for adjudication, without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: I I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3318 ]
IMONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 32 946 0F 2012
Between:
Dr. [/1. Kiran Kumar, S/o lvl V. Narasimha Rao, Aged about: 4g years, Occt:Assistant. Director (Vetennary) East Zone, Greatei liyderabad trti"rcip'ai C orporation, Hyderabad.
AND
...PETITIONER
(R5 rs rmpleaded as per Court Order, daled 04.02.2014 in W.P M.P.No.22799 of 2013)
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating the judgmeht made in o.A.No. 6886/2008 dt. 1.11.20r 1 of Hon'ble Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash the same and consequentially to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner by suspending the operation of the proc. No.gA,/euAts/op/GHMC.12-346 dt.28.8.2012 of the commissioner GHMC including consequential proceedings if any and by suspending the operation of the orders made in 0.A No. 6886/2008 dated 1.11.2011.
il2il
l.A. NO:2 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 41949 0F 2012\
Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased direct the respondents to contrnue the petitioner by suspending the operation of the Proc.No.8A/et/Ats./op/GHMC 12-346 dt.2}.oB.2012 of the commissioner GHMC including consequentiar proceedings if any by suspendang the operation of the orders made in O.A.No6886/2008 dated 01 .11.2011 pending d isposal of the above writ petition
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2 O,I3(WPMP NO: 20891 oF 2013)
Petition under sectron 15'1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 3rd respondent to continue the petitioner as Assistant Director (Veterinary) in vibw of the Letters addressed by a[ the contesting parties with Letter dated 11-022013.
Counsel for the petitioner: SRt. C. SRINIVASA BABA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI A. SREEDHAR
counsel for the Respondent No.2: cp FoR MUNrcrpAL ADMrNrsrRATroN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI R. RADHA KRTSHNA REDDy SC FOR GHMC
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Gp FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI AKKAM ESHWAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BT-ESRT JUS'IICEABHINANDKUMAR ST{AVILI AND HON'BI,T,SRIJTJSTICT]\ANIAVAR'\PI]I(AJESIIWARRAO
\,.P.No.3 of ll
ORDERT(Perlfon'bleS'iJusticc AbhinandKumarShavili)
'When the matter is taken up for hearing' Iearned
counsel aPpearingfot the petitioncr submitsthat the cause
in the writpetitiondoes not survivcfot adiudrcationand
hence, thewrit petition has bccomcinfructuous'
In view oftl're said submissir'rn, the Writ Petitionis
dismissedas infructuous.No costs'
Nfiscellancouspetitions, if any, pendingshailstand closed "'i?3'B+IRitgs'#tH/
//TRUEcoPY// sEcTlON&rflceF.
":'ilil'E']'Ergrtiffi',frfl,fl*df, :""']""T[]'
G H Mc) toP u cl SsR I ?1;rt t5i-tr**m.E+?'{r'"i
CHR . GJP-\l-,.-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1711012022
ORDER
W.P.No.32946 of 2012
'1 g SrAT!-
q -v
C.
oJ 11 lN 2Ml .)),
L)
+
.1
nFf r
,-;-
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS !NFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
C^,
Ot*"
t+-
u "
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication.
Dr. Kiran Kumar
Dr. T. Srinivasa Reddy
The Government of A.p.
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, A.p.
Dr. Y. Sadguna Devi
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
