M/s Dandamudi Bio-Tech v. The State of Telangana and 3 others
Case brief
What is this about?
Concluded a writ petition challenging the refusal to register a land document. The Court closed the main petition noting that the document had been registered under a prior interim order, while clarifying that registration did not injure third party rights.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed with no order as to costs; registration is without prejudice to third party rights.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 3'1677 OF 2022
Between:
'I . [//s Dandamudi Bio-Tech, Having its registered office at, Plot no. 99 and 100, Green park Avenue, Medchal Road, Secunderabad, Represented by its lvlanaging Partner, Sri.D.Harish Kumar 2. Sri B. Chandrasen Reddy, S/o. Late Sri B Subhashan Reddy, aged about 54 years, Occ. Senior Advocate, R/o. H. No.3-6-698/27, Avanthinagar, Basheerbagh' Hyderabad 500 029'
...'ETIT..NERS
AND
- The State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Registration and Stamps Department, Secretariat, BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether further orders are required when the subject land document is registered pursuant to an interim order.
Whether rights of third parties are preserved in the closure of the writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dandamudi Bio-Tech
- petitioner
Sri B. Chandrasen Reddy
- respondent
The State of Telangana
- respondent
The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District
- respondent
The Sub-Registrar, Shamshabad Mandal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/31677/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court