Dismissed

N. Ashok v. The State of Telagnana and 3 others

Telangana HC27 Sept 2022WP/3036/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Writ Petition No. 3036 of 2021, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Sub Registrar not to register a document regarding a specific property plot. Permission was granted to the petitioner to withdraw the petition, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

N. Ashok Vs The State of Telagnana and 3 others — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE-OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

JUESDAY ,THE^TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 3036 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

N. Ashok, S/o Late N. Yadagiri Aged about. 51 Yrs, Occ. Advocate R/o House No.1-27, Nallagandla Village. Seri Lingampally Mandal,Ranga Reddy. District

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

Ttre State of T_elagnana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department (Stamps and Registration), Secretariat at BRKR Bhavin Hyderabad'

¶11

The Commissioner and lnspector General of Stamps and Registration, Stampq and Registration Department, State of Telaganana M"ojamjahi Market, Hyderabad

¶12

The Sub Registrar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict

¶13

K.S. Prakash Rao Alias Kandi Sham Rao, S/o Late Kandi Shivaiah, aged about. 85 Yrs, Occ. Retired Emptoyee,R/o H No.6-2-505, New Bhoigu"da, Secunderabad-3

¶14

..,RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court, may be pleased to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in disposing of the representation filed by the petitioner on 21 .08.2020 till now as illegal and failure to discharge his statutory function and issue an order, direction or. writ. particularly a writ in a nature of writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent not to registrar any document in respect of petitioners property open plot in Sy.No.176, admeasuring 200Sq.Yds or equivalent to 167.02 Sq Mtrs situated at Chandanagar Village, Serilingampally Mandal and Municipality, Ranga Reddy District and bounded as North. Open Land, South. Open Land, East. 30 Wide Road, West. Neighbors and presented by the 4th respondent in favour of any third party.

¶16

¶17

lA NO:^'l O.F 2021

¶18

Petition under Section^'1 51 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in I the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to keep any document^presented by the 4th respondent pending without registration during the pendency of this writ petition.

¶19

lA NO:'f OF 2022

¶20

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^{pleased pleased} to post W.P.No.3036 of 2021 under the caption^"FOR BEING MENTIONED".

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. V V RAGHAVAN

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI CH JAYAKRISHNA, Advocate

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

i !

¶26

TrIE I{ON'llLIl SIU JUSTICIj A. ARHISH|jK I(EIlDy

¶27

WIIIT Pl_1 TITION No. 3036 of 2021

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ pehtion.

¶30

Permission accorded and the Writ petition is, accordingly,

¶31

dismissed as withdrawn

¶32

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶33

I'here shall be no order as to costs.

To,

,ITRUE^COPY/I

oepur?D{5a?}FflH sEcTloN^brrtcen

¶38

::::'""'"'r^{re ansanaa'1}

¶39

1 ti"1!:['*jry^iil""3:ir

HIGH COURT

DATED:27t0912022

!;-i
/
/.
l-
1r ttl $n'
.,

¶45

ORDER

¶46

WP.No.3036 of 2021

¶47

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶48

N. Ashok v. The State of Telagnana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N. Ashok v. The State of Telagnana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Shaheen Vs The State of Telangana

G.Ramavatharam Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Vuthapala Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Chintala Satyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana

K. Kishore Kumar Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

M/s. K S Organics and Consultants Vs The State of Telangana