High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging revisional tax orders. The petitioner sought withdrawal in favor of filing an appeal, which the court allowed, closing the writ petition without costs.
Writ petition disposed with liberty to avail remedy of appeal; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
WRIT PETITIO N NO: 29631 OF 2021
Between:
[,4/s.Arun lspat Udyog, First Floor, Kanhaiyalal Estate, Distillery Road, Ranigunj, Secunderabad - 500 003, represenled by its Partner, Sri Harshit Madan.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in lhe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ or order or directionparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus setting aside the impugned revision orderpassed by the thirdrespondent in Rc.No.R1/2212018, vide DC Order No.297, dated 1410612021, together withthe effectual order passed by the first respondent in MO No.49943, dated 3010d12021, passed for the tax period 0110412013 to 31/03/2015 as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and not based on lrue and correct facts.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition Under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleasedto pending disposal of the Writ Petition grant stay of collection of the disputedtax of Rs.1,91,092/- arising inpursuance of the revision orderpassed by thethird respondent in Rc.No.Rl/2212018, vide DC OrderNo.297,dated14.06.2021,together with the effectual orderpassed by the firstrespondent in AAONo 49943, dated 30.06.2021,passed forthe taxperiod 01.04.2013 to 31 .03.2015.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.S.SURIBABU
Counsel for the Respondents :SRI.N.VENKATESWARARAO
The Court made the following ORDER
THI HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHI.'"TAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA WRIT PETITION NO.29631 OF 2021
ORDER: (Per' he Hon'l:le Sri Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) Heard It r. S. Suri Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N,Ven :ateswara Rao, learned counsel for the respondenls. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner rvould avail tl: remedy of appeal against the revisional order and therefore seek withdrawal ol the Writ Petitir,rrr. In that ,iew of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to [he petitioner to avail his remedy in accordance with 1aw. There sl all be no order as to costs. Miscella reous applications, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
SD/.K.AMMAJI
ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
<br>..
//TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To 1 The Assistant lommissioner (ST), t/usheerabad Circle' Hyderabad'
The Assistant r;mmiiiil;; icr)' vwu-rt, secunderabad Division
Secunderaba( rmmissioner (CT), Secunderabad Division Hyde'ahad .
3 The Deputy C
4 The PrinciPal i:Ilriil:'R-";;i,J(-Cir Department' reransana secretarrat'
State of Telar
5o One CC One CC to Stto SI i i#1l#-Jrbmm Aof,o' ?o uo",," ( o P u c )
7 Two CD CoPi
8 One sPare cc )y
SA
SW
?
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310212022
ORDER
WP.No.29631of 202 I
_--4
./': a'^u S?A
o-'
23 F [? 2t?2 .)
\ /
I
DISPOSINGOF TH : W'P
WITHOUTCOSTS,
,il.) h*---<\N2-
[,4/s.Arun lspat Udyog
State of Telangana
Assistant Commissioner (ST), I\usheerabad Circle, Hyderabad
Assistant Commissioner (CT) VN,4U-ll, Secunderabad Division, Secunderabad
Deputy Commissioner (CT), Secunderabad Division Hyderabad
Ujjal Bhuyan
P. Sree Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
