Dismissed

Dr. G. Venkat Reddy, Mahabubnagar Dist. v. the Govt. of a.P., Health, Medical and Family and 9 Others

Telangana HC21 Jul 2022WP/25034/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a retired medical officer seeking quashing of an OA judgment. Counsel submitted that the petitioner is retired and the cause no longer survives. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs. Pending miscellaneous applications stand set aside.

Dr. G. Venkat Reddy, Mahabubnagar Dist. Vs the… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 25034 OF 2006

¶6

Between:

¶7

' Dr. G. Venkat Reddy, S/o. G. Kanthi Reddy, Aged about 56 years, Working as Medical Officer, Govt. Homeo Dispensary, Amangal Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary,^{Health, Medical} and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat,^Hyderabad.

¶11

The Commissioner, lndian Medicines^{and Homeopathy Department, A.P.} Hyderabad.

¶12

Dr. M. Rama Rao,

¶13

Dr. K.V.K. Babu,

¶14

Dr. N. Koteswara Rao,

¶15

Dr. J. Srinivasa Chary,

¶16

Dr. P. Bhumeswara Rao,

¶17

Dr. P. Satyanarayana,

¶18

Dr. V.A. Nagaraju,

¶19

Dr. T. Nandagopal, Jr. Medical Officer/Lecturer,^{J,S.R.S.Govt.Homeo} Medical College, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad.

¶20

(Respondents 3 to 9 are Medical Officers through O/o. Commissioner of indiah Medicine and Homeopathy Dept.,^{A.P., Hyderabad)}

¶21

...RESPONDENTS

¶22

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Courtmay be} pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ,

¶23

order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the Judgment passed in O.A.No.1669 ot 2002 dt. 29-092006 on the file of the A.P.A.T Hyderabad.

¶24

WPMP. NO: 32055 OF 2006

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment in O.A.No.^'1669 of 2002 dL.29-9-2006 on the file of the A.P.A.T., Hyderabad.

¶26

WVMP. NO: 379 OF 2OA7

¶27

Between:

¶28

T. Nandagopal, S/o. Venkataswamy, Aged about 49 years, Occ: Lecturer, Gururaja Government Homeopathy Medical College, Gudiwada, Krishna District.

¶29

....PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1 O

¶30

AND

¶31

Dr. G. Venkat Reddy, S/o. G. Kanthi Reddy, Aged about 56 years, Working as Medical Officer, Government Homeo Dispensary, Amangal Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District.

¶32

...RESPONDENT/PETITlONER

¶33

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Wetfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶34

The Commissioner, lndian Medicines and Homeopathy Department, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

¶35

Dr. M. Rama Rao,

¶36

Dr. K.V.K. Babu,

¶37

Dr. N. Koteshwer Rao,

¶38

Dr. J. Srinivasa Chary,

¶39

Dr. P. Bhumeshwar Rao,

¶40

Dr, P. Satyanarayana,

¶41

'10. Dr. V.A. Nagaraju,

¶42

(Respondents 4 to I are Medical Officers through O/o. Commissioner, lndian Medicines and Homeopathy Department, A.P., Hyderabad)

¶43

...REqPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶44

Petition under section^{151 cPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in^{support of the petition, the High Court maybe pleasedto} vacate the interim order dated 02-0'l-2007^{passed in W.P.M.P.No. 32055 of 2006} in W.P.No. 25034 of 2006.

¶45

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI AJAYKUMARREP- FOR} SRI Y. S. VENKATA RAO

¶46

Counsel forthe Respondent^{Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR SERVICES ll}

¶47

Counsel forthe Respondent^{No.10:SRI P. KISHORERAO}

¶48

Counsel for the Respondents:^{SRIM' SURENDER RAO}

¶49

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶50

r l

¶51

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶52

AND

¶53

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶54

W.P. No.25O34 of 200,6

¶55

QRD-^E_B: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauiti)

¶56

Today, whcn thc matter has been taken up for hearing, the lcarrtcd counscl Sri Ajay Kumar, reprcsenting thc learned counsel for ttrc pcrir ioncr, informcd this Court that the writ petitioner is retired lro m scn,icc and thc causc in the u,rit petition does not survive for etdj uriir':r r ion.

¶57

llccording thc said submission made by the learned counsel for thc pctitioncr, this writ petition ts dismissed AS in fru ctuou s Therc shzrll bc no ordcr as to costs.

¶58

As a scq uc l, misccllancous applications, if any pcnding, shal I stand <-ktscd.

¶59

//TRUE COPY//

¶60

sD/-K.AMplAJt ASSISTANT REGIS,trRAR /

¶61

SECTION C'FFICER

¶62

To,

¶63

One CC to SRI Y. S. VENKATA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

¶64

Two CCs to GP for Services-ll, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶65

One CC to SRI P. KISHORE RAO, Advocate IOPUC]

¶66

One CC to SRI M. SURENDER RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

¶67

Two CD Copies,

¶68

One Spare Copy

MP SW \sr

HIGH COURT

DATED:21 10712022

ORDER

WP.No.25034 of 2006

}1€ STA IF
( ..'<br>* ?'<br>I (.)J ')Z
L] 1 1 r{01J 2c?2 Ct
.i

¶75

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

Dr. G. Venkat Reddy, Mahabubnagar Dist. v. the Govt. of a.P., Health, Medical and Family and 9 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. G. Venkat Reddy, Mahabubnagar Dist. v. the Govt. of a.P., Health, Medical and Family and 9 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Kanaka Mohan and Another, Vs Finance Dept., (Works and Projects) Rep. by Prl. Sec. and 3 Ors.

V.Lakshminarayana Vs B.Daniel

P. Narasimha Rao, Vs Sri K. Dayanand

Smt. Kamakshmamma, Mahabubnagar District Vs the District Medical and Health Officer and 2 Others

Smt.v.Shailaja, Vs The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan rep by Commissioner, Vs Mrs. Muneerunnisa Begum W/o S.A. M. Shultari