Writ petition filed by a retired Deputy Tahsildar seeking quashing of a tribunal judgment was declared infructuous as the petitioner had retired from service. The High Court dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I32n0 I
/
HIGH COUI{T FOR l'HI' STATE OI.'TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD (Spetial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT
TI{E HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
.I'IIE HONOUI{ABLE SRI JI.]S'I'ICE N.V.SIIITAVAN KUMAR
\'RIT PETITION NO: 22864 OIr 200,{
IletrYeen:
P. Narasimha Rao,, S/o. P. Krishna Rao, DEPLITY TAHSILDAR, Urban tand Ceiling, M.J. Raod, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
I . Sri K. Dayanand,, Senior Assistant, O/o. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.
... RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI and to call lor the records relating to and connected with the Judgment of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal rendered in O.A.No. 8649 of 2002 dated l309-2004 and quash or set aside the same with all consequential benefits,
I.A. NO: I OF 2004(WPMP. NO: 30004 OF' 2004)
Petition under Section l5l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppoit of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the juqiement of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal rendered in O.A.No. 8649 of 2002 datedl3 -09-2004 and pass such otherorder or orders
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. P KISHORE RAO
Counsel for thc Ilespondent NOs R3 to R4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondents: M DILIP RAO
The Court made the follorving: ORDER
THE HON BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUfl ,I.II SIIAVILI
AND
THE H( N'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAI, Ii:UI\IAR
Ir,rit Petition No.22864 of 2C)O I
ORDER: (l .r Hon'ble Justtce Abhinand Kumar ShQuih)
When the matter is taken up for hear ng, Learned counsel for the petitioner informed the C)or lrt t.1at the
writ petitior :er has retired from service, thtrs rendering the present u'rit petition as infructuous
as'inliuctu,r-Ls'. No costs.
if an_v in thir Writ Petition, shall stand clos€.(l
Sd/- K. SAII, HI DI' I'[iT\ IIE(;IS
//TRUE COPY// iI..CTION FICEII
'I'o,
I-AK
J
\
HIGIT(lOt R:'l'
AKSJ & NVSKJ
DATED:20 I Y,t 12022
OIU)HIT
I€n.<br>I
) I 0 lrlj 2$11
<br>
WP.No.22tt6 I of 2004
WRI'T PI]]'t I-]{ON IS DTSMISSED WI'TIII(-IXIT COSTS
o (n uB \
P. Narasimha Rao
Sri K. Dayanand
Smt. B. Rajeshwari
The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration
The Collector
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
N.V. Shrivatsan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
