Writ petition challenging failure to regularize coal load was dismissed as infructuous. Court accepted counsel's submission that the cause of action has ceased to exist.
The Writ Petition and Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
13302 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO 23222 0F 2021
Between:
M/s Rapelli Rajanna S/o. Narsaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ Business R/o.24-33, Angadi Bazar Mandamairi - 504 23i, Mancherial District. Telangana
...P5T:TION E R
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courr nay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declarrng the action of the respondents in failing to consider the representations of the petitioner d|.1110912021 , 1gi07 12021 , 2111212020, 2311112020, 2310412020 and 13/08/2019 for regularizing thc-l agreed amount of load as per the terms and conditions of the agreernent bond dt.03/06/2019 for supply of the Coal from JVROC Mines to RCHP andr-rVK 5 GL
(
bunkers, Kothagudernarea and supplyjngdeficit load contrary:o the agreement as illegal. arbltrary rnd unconstitutaon a I and contrary to the aqreerrlentbond dt.05/06/2019 and c)nsequently directthe respondentsto su[)ply th': tequired load to the petitioner forproper supply of Coal in termsof the aqreententbond dt.05/06/2019.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circr.rnstarries stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High Court m,ry be pieased to direct the respondt nts to consider the representations o' the petitioner dt.11109t2021,19t07t?O21 ,21112t2020,2311112020,2310412020 arrd 13/08/20'19, pending disposal of tl e above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petit oner: SRI P SHRAVAN KUMAR GOLjD
Counsel for the Respcndent : SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY,
(SC FOR SINGARENI COLLIERIES CO r-l-D)
The Court made the f >llowing: ORDER
I
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITIoN No.23222 of 2O2L
ORDER:
Learned Counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that ihe cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
pending, shall st arncl closed
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY-REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYi/ QD SECTION OFFICER
To,
SK bs A.J!
HIGH COUFT
DATED:201'' 212022
ORDER
WP.No.232 22 ot 2021
.;. gfAfe
1l'
I
, 2! l[!{ 208 i
i.-:.
\9,u
\
a -i..........: +{8,'
DISMISSITIG THE WRIT PETITTON AS INFRU 3TOUS
q r>g
{"'lY
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition survives in view of the petitioner's submission that the cause of action no longer exists.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s Rapelli Rajanna
The Singareni Collieries Company Limited
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
