Dismissed

K.Ravinder v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Jul 2022WP/20871/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the structure and content of the TET 2022 paper as illegal and discriminatory. The court held that since the exam was conducted on 12.06.2022 and results declared on 01.07.2022, the petition had become infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs due to the fulfillment of the subject matter (exam held, results declared).

K.Ravinder Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA; AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 20871 OF 2022

¶7

i I I t t I

¶8

¶9

Bet	ween:
1.	K.RavinderS/o.Hanmanthu, Age:.37yea-rs,Occ:Student, R/o.Narsayapally,Bantaram mandal, NagarkurnoolDistrict.
2	T.Narsimhulu, S/o.Venkataiah, Age: 30years,Occ:Student, R/o.Pudugurthivillage,Pudurmandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict.
3	R.Srinu, S/o.Ramulu, Age: 30years,Occ:Student, R/o.Maisigandivillage, Kadthal mandal,Ranga ReddyDistrict.
4	K.Aluvelu,S/o.Lakshmaiah, Age:36 years,Occ:Student, R/o.Lingandhan,Keshampetmandal, RangaReddyDistrict.
5	D.Moulana,S/o.Nabhisab, Age:29 years, Occ:Student, R/o.Dhanura, Tekmal mandal, MedakDistrict.
6	S.Santosh,S/o.Ramalakshmaiah, Age: 36years,Occ:Student, R/o.FlatNo.95, TVR Residency, Pranithacolony, Ameenpur, Hyderabad-5O2O32.

¶10

¶11

I I I I

¶12

	k 25	I		{t il i ,rl
7	P.Sujatha, D/o.Suresh, A21e:.37years,Occ:Student, R/o.H.No.1-38-3439/l, Sivanagar, Balammarai, Sccunderabad,Hyderabad-SOoOO3		I I i I	ii i I I
B	B.Rambabu,S/o.BaIa, Age:32 years, Occ:Student, R/o.Suraram,Gandipudi mandal, KhammamDistrict.		i L I I h i I	1i il il
9	M.Harigopala Chary,S/o.BheLskaraChar5r, Age:48years, Occ:Student, R/o.FlatNo.301,Sri DathaHomes, Kamalanagar,Ranga ReddyDistrict.		I : I I I i	I!l ii ilrl
10.	P.Ramchander,S/o. Jagina, Age:35 years,Occ:Student, R/o.Thummalakunta Thanda, T'himmajipetamandal, NagarkurnoolDistrict.		i I I tI I I	1l ,l ;
11.	M.Maheshwarji,S/o.Madharji, Age:32 years, Occ:Student, R/o.Palemvillage, Bijenepalli mandal, NagarkurnoolDistrict.		I I i i I
12	.I).Balraju,S/o.Nagabhusharram,' ,\ge: 28 years, Occ:Student, It/o.Rajapeta village,NalgonclaDistrict.	tl ,	I I	,l rl
13	.i(.Raghavender,S/o.Venkatrilah, ,Age:32 years, Occ:Student, R/o.Boyapurvillage,Bijenepa-llymandai; NagarkurnoolDistrict-5O92C3. !		I I	rl t't i
14	.K.Sujatha,D/o.Seshachari, Age:40years,Occ:Student, R/o.H.No.2-6-t2I6ll, I{LNReddycolony, Subedari, HeurzrmkondaDistrict. I I			I i i i

¶13

_*"-.-'*rr'P..:4M;€. _, , i:*awEl

¶14

¶15

i! i I fi I II ; t I -l t I ,l : rl liI rl

¶16

¶17

l I i I iiL aI J $i I ir, i

¶18

	26
1s.i	Gouramma,D/o.Basavaraju, Age:40 years,Occ:Student, R/o.H.No.6-1-27/4,OldVegmarket, Ranga ReddyDistqict-SOI141.
6 1	C.Radhakrishna,S/o.Sailu, Age: 33yea-rs,Occ:Student, R/o.Ananthavararnvillage, Balmurmandal,NagarkurnoolDistrict.
7 1	KoratiNagaiah,S/o.Bakaiah, Age;37 years,Occ:Student, R/o.Ravulapeta village,Themulapalymandat, NalgondaDistrict.
18.	B.Narayana,S/o.Tharaiah, Age: 39years, Occ: Student, R/o.Yallampet village,Machareddy mandal, KamareddyDistrict.
19. 1	D.SravanKumar,s/o.D.Seetha_rarnaSarma Age: 37years, Occ: Student, R/o.H.No.21-133,Maruthinagar, Achampet mandal, NagarkurnoolDistrict. ...Petitioners AND The Stateof Telangana, RepbyitsPrincipalSecretarlr, SchoolEducation(Exams)Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad.
2	TheDirector,State Counselfor EducationalResearch andTraining(SCERT)and Ex-Officio Director, TSTET2O22,Hyderabad.
a	Convenor, TeachersEligibilityTest, SCERT, Hyderabad. ....Respondents ^^- *^n6 At.. atn

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction especially orre in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that

¶20

a) action of the respondents in prescribing paper-|y' (A) or lV(B) for other teachers (petitioners) as structure and content for papr:r-ll of Teachers Eligibility fest 2022 scheduled to be conducted on 121612O22 as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory violative article^'14 and 16 of the ConstitLtion of lndia.

¶21

b) Further declare that the respondents shall change the syllabus for paper-ll and conduct the TET examination accordingly-

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶23

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to delete the syllabus of paper-lV(A) or lV(B) to the candidates for Bachelor of Languages TPT candidates and prescribe a separate syllabus, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SRINIVASA RAO MAI)IRAJU (NOT PRESENT)

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No 1 : SRl. A. SANJEEVI, KUMAR

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No's 2 & 3 : SRl. MUDDU VIJAY / Addl. Advocate General

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

I I

¶29

¶30

TI'IE HON'BLE THE EIIIEF I-US:TIEE UIIAI.BT{I,YAN AND

¶31

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SUREPAILI NANDA W.P.No. 20877 of 2022

¶32

ORDER, rpr. rl" rlo,^bL th.^a.hD[ [ n ttdl Bh{to,)

¶33

Nt.rnc appcars lrrr the pcdtroners on call though

¶34

Mr. ,'\ndapalli San;co' Iiumar, lcarncd Spccial Government Pleader

¶35

lor rcspondcnt No.1 Ls prcscnt, so also, Mr. Muddu Vijay, learned counsel frrr respondcnrs No.2 and 3.

¶36

Perrtr<.rncrs havc rnadc thc lollowing prayer in this wnt

¶37

PCfltl(⁾ⁿ

¶38

"lr rs tirclctorc pralcd that this Flon'ble Court may be pleased r(, lssLtc .r nTrr, ortlcr or clircction cspccially, onc in tlre naturc or wnt of rnandarnus declaring that -

¶39

¶40

(a) actrorr oi thc tcspondcnts in prescribing paper-Iv(A) or I'(ti) irrr otircl teachcrs^(pctidoners) as structure and c()ntcnt ti.rr prpct of^'lcaclters liligrbility^'fcst, 2022. sclrcrlulcti trr bc conductcd on 12-06-2022 as ilegal, arbrtran anrl rirsc nrnrnat<>rr violative of Atticles 14 anci l(r tri'thc^{(.orrsrrLruon} oI lrrdia.

¶41

'bt^{i'Lrrrhcr-dcclarc tlr:rr the rcspondcnts shall change thc} sliiabus firr papcr-ll and conduct thc^'l'tl'I examination :rccortlirtgl..

¶42

¶43

¶44

(c) and pass such <.rrdcr or orders as this H,.,n'ble^(-ourt may dcemed 6t and propcr in the circur ns t rrr.rccs of thc case.

¶45

Learned Special^(iovcrnmcnt Plcadcr has inhrrrncd us that the Teachcrs' liligibilin^'l cst tirr thc vear 20'2 rvrrs con<lucted on 12.06.2022 and results thcreof lrave also bccn de,clared on01,.07.2022

¶46

In that view of the mattcr, this rvrit pctiur>n has become infructuous.

¶47

Accordingly, thc rvrit pctitiorr is disr rrisscd as in fructuous.

¶48

No costs.

¶49

As a sequei, misccllarreous pctitions, pencling if any, stand

¶50

dismissed.

¶51

¶52

SD/.B.SAWAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// , SECTION OFFICER

¶53

¶54

To,

¶55

'1 . One CC to SRI SRINIVASA RAO tvlADlRAJU, Advocate [OPUC]

¶56

Two CCs to the Advocate^{General, High Court for the State of Telangana} touTl

¶57

bne CC to SRI MUDDU^{VIJAY, Advocate} [OPLIC]

¶58

Two C.D. CoPies

¶59

One Spare Copy. MRC

¶60

S A\v-

HIGH COURT

DATED:0410712022

ORDER

WP.No.20871 of 2022

'1 \Ae s1.t\i6
2 2 sEP ?0I7
..

¶67

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS !NFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶68

1 l'1rr .A^)r

K.Ravinder v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Ravinder v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tabeti Suresh Kumar Vs Canara Bank (Syndicate Bank) and another

M/s Tnr Industries (P) Ltd., Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Sudhalcar Gupta and anothers Vs Singidi Ram Reddy

News Item published Vs State of Telangana

Kodicherla Anjalaiah and 15 others Vs State of Telangana and 5 others

Butham Vamshikrishna Vs State of Telangana and 4 others