The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 20048 of 2022 on withdrawal by the petitioner, declaring no order as to costs and closing pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 20048 OF 2022
Betwee n:
M/s Srinivas Bangaramma Steel lndustries Pvt. Ltd, Erstwhile Srrnivasa Profiles and Textiles Pvt. Ltd, S.No. 1/2, 113, 117,1/8, 6/8 and 613, Sripuram Viltage. Gantyada Mandal, Vizianagaram District Rep. by its IVanaging Director, V.V.Satayanarayana S/o V.Narsinga Rao, Aged about years, R/o Plot No 18, Allied Housing Society, Near SP Bunglow, I,4ayuri Junction, Vizianagaram District.
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue'a wiit or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring declaring the sale notice dated 1010312022 issued by the respondent to sell movable and immovable assets of the petitioners properties mentioned in the impugned notice as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without following due process of law and contrary to the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement Of Security lnterest Act, 2002 and set the saide the impugned sale notice dated 1010312022.
lA NO: 1 oF 2022
Petition under,section1 51 CPC prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the High court may be pleasedto stay of all furtherproceedings including auction of the petitioner propertiesmentioned in the sale.noticer dated,.1olo3l2o22issued by the 1st respondent,pending disposal of the mainWritPetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S SURENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the RespondentNo 1 : PODILA HARI PRASAD Counsel for theRespondentNo 2 : "-'
The Court made thefollowing: ORDER
! ir"
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHTIYAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLINANDA
WRIT PETITION No.2OO48 of 2022
ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Uljat Bhuyan)
Heard Mr. S.Surendra Kumar, learned counselfor the petitioner and Mr. Podila Hari Prasad, learned counselfor the re spondents.
rr'ithdrau'al . H oq'ever, the re shi'rll beno orderas to costs
any, in this Writ Petition, shall standclosed.
SD/.M.MANJULA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// oI) SECTIdN OFFICER
To,
\
\4\4 A
HIGH COURT
DATED:2110412022
ORDER
WP.No.20048 of 2022
1 gE lii47 (a
t <br>o() 3 0 JUL 2022
C)
* o
DISMISSING OFTHE WRIT PETITIONAS WITHDRAWN WITHOUTCOSTS
'%"*
1Q)
M/s Srinivas Bangaramma Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd.
The State Bank of India
The Canara Bank
Ujjal Bhuyan
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
