Petitioner withdrew a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the respondent bank's attempt to take physical possession of property during pending SARFAESI adjudication before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THETWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEUJJALBHUYAN
THE HONOURABLEMRSJUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO:18430 0F 2022
Between:
Tummala Anitha, W/o. ShekharReddy,Aged about50 Years, Occ- Business 'R/ o. Flat No. 115,Vinay City Apartments, Anand NagarX Roads' Bandlaguda' Nagole, Hyderabad- 500068.
...PETITIONER
AND
Uflion Bank of lndia,(formerly known as Andhra Bank) Repby its Authorized Officer, Ramchandrapuram,Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High court may be pleased to pass order or orders directionmore particularlyin the nature of writof Mandamusoranyotherappropriatewrit,orderbySettingasidetheactionofthe respondent trying totake physical possessionof the schedule propertythrough advocate commissionervidecrlp mp no 135t22in whtut serving any possession
noticeeventhoughSA|RNo3g2of2022ispendingadiudicationbeforethe Honble DRT-Il,Hyderabad by declaring the action of the respondent bank is to be declared asillegal null and void by directingthe respondent bank not to proceed further in takingphysicalpossessionof the property as well as sale of property of thepetitioner in respect and consequently directthe Debts Recovery Tribunal
lA NOt1oF 2022
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheCircumstancesstatedin theaffidavitfiledinSupportofthepetition'theHighCourtmaybepleasedtostay of a[ furtherproceedings of the respondent tryingto take physical possession of the schedulepropertythroughadvocate commissionervide crlp mp no 135122 without servingany possession notice initiatedby the respondent bank under the provisions of theSARFAESI Act till the disposal of SA
Counselfor the Petitioner SRI' HAMSA DURGA PONNAM
Counsel forthe Respondent : V DYUMANI
The Courtmadethe following: ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITI ON No.18430 of 2022
ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sn Jusrrce Ltjjal Bhuyan)
Heard Mr. Meherprasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. Hamsa Durga ponnam, learned counsel for the petitioner.
4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if anv, in tl-ris Writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
6D
SECTION OFFICER
To,
2 One CC to SRl. HAIIIISA DURGA PONNAil,4 Advocate [OPUC]
-t
HIGH COURT
\ DATED:21to4tzo22
ORDER
WP.No.18430 ot 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWAL
WITHOUT COSTS
----..--.:--:<br>I 1 fl JUL 2[22 oz-
\ \s'glr^ ,"*,
1<br>
Tummala Anitha
Union Bank of India
Ujjal Bhuyan
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
