Heard learned counsel for the petitione r, Iearned Government p.reader for E.ergy appearing for respondent No.1, sri R.Vinod Reddy, iearned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 6, and Sri N. praveen Kumar, learned sta^cling Counser appearing for responde,t No, writ Petirio,.r is bei,g clisposed orar rrre r,"r" "r:,:r:^:;*'*t the present 2) In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents' more particurarry respo.dent Nos 4 and 5, in refusing to rerease trre power suppiy to the petitioner,s premises situateci at Sri Sai Nagar Colony (Devenc-iranagar), Bachupally Village an. Mandal, Medchal_Malkajgiri District. 3) Learnecr counsei for the petitioner sub,rits that the respo.dent authorities have refused to rerease the power supp.ry fo the subject premises belonging to the petitioner oide refusal letter N o.LTM222360091,, d.ated, 76.03.2022. 4) Learnecl Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 6, on instructions, has stated that basing on the lefter addressed by respondent No.Z ai'le No NMC'/ G/03/2020 dated 14'05.2020, power supply to tl.re premises of the petitione. was refused to be rereased He further submits that if the pefitioner. rnakes an appricatio.' again, trre autho,ities w,, receive the same and pass necessary orders thereon, as per law. 5) Trris Court has time ancl again reiter-ated trrat irre authorities concernecr ha'e to consider trre apprication for power connection on its own merits and
