Disposed

Mamatha Srivari v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC12 Apr 2022WP/18084/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A staff nurse challenged her allocation to a different cadre zone, invoking Article 226 CPC and Section 151 CPC. The Court, relying on previous similar orders in W.P. No. 36688 of 2021 and a batch dated 28-12-2021, disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's separate appeal dated 02-01-2022 within a period.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's appeal dated 02-01-2022 in accordance with law within a period from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

Mamatha Srivari Vs The State of Telangana… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY^{OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITION^{NO: 1808 40F 2022}

¶6

Between:

¶7

53 vears. Occ. Staff^Nurse, Mamatha Srivari,^{W/o Ravindranath,Age'} o Ln deoutation)^{Fl/o. H. No 8-7-} Osmania General^{Hospital. (Presently workin} Sagar^{Road, HYderabad-79} S3/KS/5, Kasturi^{Colony, Hastinapura'ruonn'}

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 il::i.xi:.:Jl:lill;?,13T34!Bf'15?i'31'[i'?:ffi'#:3:1:o'*"'nn'

¶11

2 The^{Director, Public Health and FamilyWelfare'Hyderabad' TelanganaState} ...RESPONDENTS

¶12

lndia^{prayingthat in the} Petition^{under Article226 of the Constitution} 'of filed^{therewith' the High court may be} circumstances^{stated in tn""} "''0"'" ;;.,.^{ssue . -,- "'} [.:i:..ji::;;;qi:J,tr r,lffi:rH writ^{of Mandamusbv} "'"'T t;'";"; Qt2o21"-t--l'n'," Locar^{cadre Zone-Vl'} HM/D1/zvt/zlv/SrNui0set' _"::;,;;., ,...r::, new^{local cadre Zone t:;;;}="nioritywhich is conrrary^{to crause20 or} charminar^{ignoring tt"} 'r;;;; ""nd mo^{No. 165b/s pF-v2oz1-7,} tt't1;:;,lnconstirutionar cir"utu' Y' o",nn violative of articres 14, G.o.trils.^{No 3'17} " same^{and consequently duect} Dr.23t12t2021^{as illegal',} 1 ffi;;a =",^{,.'0",,::"""r} and^{a*ocate her to Zone-Vl,} 16 and^{2't of constitutionotr',.";;} "t,n".:"^::::" the petitioner^{wilr be put to} the^{respondentsto constu.,'} otherwis n"l =""arn, Charminar^{on consider} heavY^{and irreParable loss}

¶13

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶14

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^statedin the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^{pleased to} direct the respondents to retain/allot the petitioner to Zone-Vl, Charminar by suspending the operation of the impugned proceedings of allotment to Zone-Vll, Jogulamba bearing No. HM/D1/ZVtlztvlsrNu/o891, dated 3ollzl2ozl , issued by the 2nd respondent, othenruise the petitioner wil be put to heavy and irreparabre loss.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner : SRl. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents : Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW The Court made the following : ORDER

¶16

¶17

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN^REDDY

¶18

WRIT^{PETITTON No.I 8084} F 2022

¶19

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

Kumar,^{leamed counsel for the} Heard^{Mr' Gadi Praveen} petitioner,^{and leamed Assistant Government Pleaderfor Medical} and^{Health,andperusedthe material on record'}

¶22

¶23

Learned^{counselfor both sides report that in similar} circumstances'^{this Courtpassed orders in W'P' No'36688 of 2021} and^{batch dated 28'12'202iand'in terms thereof' this writ petition} nraY^{be disPosed of'}

¶24

Therefore'^{recording the aforesaidsubtrission of the iearned} fotlo*i"g^{the order in W'P' No'36688of} counsel 2021^{and batch on either} 'iO"'^{dated28'122OZl'in telms thereof' this writ} petition^{is disposed of directing the respondentsto considerthe} petitioner's^{appeal dated O2'Ol'2022,-j} :::::;,;::: thereon'^{in accordancewith law' withina peno} fiom^{the date of receiptof a copy of this order' No orderas to} costs.

--,'-

----'-

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending

¶29

ln the writ petition stand closed

---'--

esssriRf?85sE ESHA

,TRUE COPY//

To,

SECTI ON OFFICER

" J: :.5,:?,'Jit3i"' :lig;X;:I,!; yrx*: i: !d Fa m iry we rra re De p a rtm e n t, 2. The Director, public He, ,no Famirv wsflsps, F,y 3. one cc to sRl. ooo, ,]l

¶36

¶37

Two CD Copies ^^{i*!:,".".r,,"#*.ffi)frtr;ffi ;:fi :il .:.} ",

¶38

One Spare Copy

CKY

BS k''.x'

HIGH^COURT

DATED^;1210412022

ORDER

1 LA-
A\ ir',
N"
a
lJ"i
F
s<br>d
(a
v-o c'
J- <br>t/.,
9, I'
..<br>

¶45

WP.No.18084 ot²⁰²²

¶46

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶47

O..,,lrt
2lr"olW

Mamatha Srivari v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamatha Srivari v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaib Hussain Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Sudershan Lokhande Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Thudumdebba Aadivasi Seva Samithi Vs Sri Somesh Kumar, IAS and 5 others

Sandhyarani Kondapaka Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.N.Geethanjali Vs The District Collector

K.Pradeep Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others