High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking re-allotment of a pension/employment matter by directing respondents to consider the petitioner's pending appeal within four weeks, relying on earlier similar judgments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B,VIJAYSENREDDY
WRI T PETITION NO: 17713 OF 2022
Between:
lr/. Yadagiri, S/o. I/. Bhumaiah(Late), agedabout44 years, Panchayat Secretary Gr.ll G ra-m Panchayat Salbathapur, BantwaramMandal, Vikarabad District.(lD No.1962779).
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oflhe constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High courtmaybe pleased to issue a writ order or orders morein the natureof writ of lMandamus declare the impugnedProc.NO.PR/PA/ZIVIPASE/0015dt.1010112022 issued by the 1st respondent allotting toVikarabaddistrict contraryto petitioner'soption exercised to YadadriBhuvanagirizone-Vdistrict under spouse categoryas per Guideline 23proviso ofG.o.lr,4s.No.317 dt.06.12.2021 and not implementing Govt.lVlemo.No.1655/SPD-1i2021-dt.24.12.2021 with regard to allotmentof spouse category candidatesdespiteavailabilityofvacanciesinYadadri Bhuvanagiri district whileimplementingand allotting spouse category candidates in other districts asper the above memoabove is clearly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory andunjust and set aside the same and consequentlydeclare that the petitioner is entitledto be re-allotted to YadadriBhuvanagiridistrictzone-v under spouse categoryas per option with all consequentialbenefits
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the grievance of the petitioner for relocating to Yadadri Bhuvanagiri dist, Zone- V under spouse cartegory by disposing of the appeal dt. 2911212021 pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. P UGENDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: cP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. L77t3 0F 2022
ORDER:
Heard Mr. P.Ugender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government pleader for Service-ll for the respondents. perused the material on record.
2
W.P.No.36688 of 2021 andbatch dated 28.12'2021shall
form part of the record.No orderas to costs.
4 As a sequel thereto,miscellaneouspetitions, il
an1', pending inthe q'rit petition stand closed
SD/-K.ONESIM
ASSIS NT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
SB *'o
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810412022
/,-r" c.'
I
cI 0 4 t'1.1i 2022
ORDER
WP.No.17713 of 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS.
\t/-)k
L/r. Yadagiri
The District Collector (Panchayat Wing), Vikarabad district
The District Collector (Panchayat Wing), Yadadri Bhuvanagiri district
Commissioner for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development-cum-Chairman, Allocation Committee
The State of Telangana
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
