Dismissed

Rajitha Nerella v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC8 Apr 2022WP/17632/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging the allocation of a government employee to a different zone despite vacancies in her local zone, the High Court disposed of the petition in accordance with a similar order in W.P.No.36688 of 2021 and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's appeals within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition disposed of directing respondents to consider appeal dated 29.12.2021 within four weeks.

Rajitha Nerella Vs The State of Telangana and another — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH^{DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{B.VIJAYSEN REDDY}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 17632^{OF 2022}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Raiitha Nerella, D/o. Late^{N.Saraiah, Aged about 39 years, working as-Selior} Asiistant, Govt. l.T.l.^{(Boys), Bhoopalpally, Jayashankar Bhoopalpally District'} R/o. H.'Nlo.3-l^{-31b, -} Ftat^{No.504,' R.K.Residency,Hanamakonda,} Hanamakonda District^- 506^001.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 . The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Prl. Secretary- Emp-loymentandTraining} Department, Secretariat^{Buildings, Hyderabad - 500 022.}

¶12

The Commissioner, Department^{of EmploymentandTraining, State of} Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of^{the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavit filed therewith,the High court may be} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction^{more particularlya writ of Mandamus,} declaring the action of^{the 2nd respondentin issuingthe impugnedProceedings} No.LA/EM/ZVIZ|ISEAS/0012, da[ed.27-12-2021^{Wherein allocatingthe petitioner} to zone-l^{(Kaleswaram) though there are vacancies availablein her local Zone-lV} (Bhadradri) as per the G.O.Ms.No.317, GA(SPF),^{Dept. Dated 06-12-2021as} illegal, improper. unjust,^{arbitrary. contrary to law and also viotationof principlesof} natural^justice and set aside^{the sameby further directing the respondentsto} consider the case of the^{petitioner for allocation to her nativeZone-lV(Bhadradri)} in the existing vacancies^{dulyconsideringher appeal dated 29-12-2021'}

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^statedin the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{HighCourt may be pleasedto direct} the respondents to consider the appeal dated^{29-12-2021 and representation} dated 08-02-2022 submitted by the^{petitioner requesting for allocation to her} native Zone-lV^{(Bhadradri) pending} disposal^{of the writ petition.}

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. B.KRISHNA

¶18

Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR EMPLOYMENT^{AND TRAINING} DEPARTMENT

¶19

The Courl made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

I I

¶22

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶23

WRIT PETITION No. 17632 0F 2022

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Heard Mr. B.Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Service-l for the respondents. Perused the material on record.

¶26

2 Learned counsel for both sides report that in similar circumstances, this Court passed orders in W.P.No.36688 of 2O2l and batch dated 28. t2.2o2t and, in terms thereof, this writ petition may be disposed of.

¶27

Therefore, recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel on either side, following the order in W.P.No.36688 of 2O2l and batch dated 28.t2.2021, in terms thereof, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's appea-l dated 29.12.2021 and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The order in

¶28

¶29

W.P.No.36688 of 2O2l and^{batch dated 28.12.2021 shall}

¶30

form part of the record.^{No order as to costs.}

¶31

As a sequel thereto,^{miscellaneouspetitions,if}

¶32

any, pending in the writ^{petition stand closed.}

¶33

¶34

//TRUE COPY/i

¶35

SD/-T,KRISHNA^KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶36

SECTION OFFICER

¶37

¶38

To, 1. The Prl. Secretary,^{EmploymentandTrainingD-ep€rtment'State of} f ef angina, Secrtit'ariat'^{Bu'ild ings, Hyderabad - 500 022'} z. i[" Ci,."iissioner,^{Departmeitof Employmentand Training' State of} Telanoana. Hvderabad. 3. o;; iC to' sht.^{B.KRISHNA Advocate} tolqql- ..... ;. i;; ccr to op^{Fbn eN,rplovtr/ler'trnuo TRAINING DEPARTMENT} 'Hish Court for the Stirte^{of Telangana} [OUT] 5. Two CD^CoPies. 6. One Spare^CoPY. GB SW \nk

¶39

HIGH COURT

¶40

DATED:0810412022

¶41

I
T E o A.
1
o
lut ul
11 +.b
t
t) :;

¶42

ORDER

¶43

WP.No.17632 of²⁰²²

¶44

DISPOSING OF^{THE WP}

¶45

WITHOUT COSTS.

Rajitha Nerella v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajitha Nerella v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Taaza International Limited Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Jakkidi Nirmala Vs The State of Telangana

L. Govind Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana

M. Yadagiri Vs The District Collector

Tirumalakonda Nagamani Vs State of Telangana

Shaib Hussain Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others