The High Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the competent authority to consider the petitioner's representation for the Sadar Kazi post within four weeks without examining merits.
Directing the competent authority to consider the petitioner's representation within four weeks and conduct an internal inquiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
I\4ONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 17452 OF 2022
Between:
Syed Nemathulla, S/o Late Syed lsakh, Age about 51years, Occ- Moulvi,Rlo2-117' Godal Village, Balmoor lr4andal, lr/ahboobNagar District.
...pETtTloNER
AND
3Tffi R5y"#"Jr''l?;;),wil:lr:i?H[: i d;iionNaga'*ur"e"r,Dr:tr]:^l 6. The Tahsildrr,arr,it?ilutiii'Aiin "ip"t-Diuition'Nasarkurnool District'
...RESPONDENTS
Petitionunder Article226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court maybe pleasedtoto issue any appropriateWrit' Order or direction preferab'lyWrit of lr,4andamus,declaring the inaction of the OfficialRespondentsin not takingany actionon the representationof the Petitioner Dt Ogth December 2021 and1 1th January2021 morepa'tit't"tythe action of the Respondentsin not considering thename of the Petitioner for the post of Sadar Kazi' Achampet Village' Stateas being illegal'contraryto the Rulesand NagarkurnoolDistrict' '"nn'nu RegulationsoftheKazinctr-aaoandalsoViolativeofArticlesl4and300.AoftherespondentsNo 4 and 5' Constitutionof lndia uno lonLq"ntlydirectthe -Official to forthwithreiect the '"0"n "''O Achampet Division' vide File No E/733/2020 dated24th December 2020'
il2il
IAN O: 1OF2 22
Petition under section '1 51 cpc praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the official respondents to consider the name of the petitioner for the post of Sadar Kazi, Achampet Virage, Nagarkurnoor District and other surrounding Villages and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, pending disposar of the above Writ petition. Counset for the petitioner: SRl. MUSTAFA BASITH
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Gp FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counset for the Respondent No.3: SRt ABU AKRAM, SC FOR WAKF BOARD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
UIRIT PETITION No.17452 of2O22
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Minorities Wellareappearing for respondent Nos' 1 and 2, Sri Abu Akram, the learnedStanding Counsel for Wakf Board appearingfor Pleader forRevenue respondent No.3,and the learned Government With theirconsent, the Writ Petitionis appearingfor respondent Nos'4 to 6 disposedof at the stageof admissionitself theaction of the official Thiswrit Petition 1S filedquestioning in nottakinganY actionon the representation of the petitioner respondents f SadarKazi ' .2021andnot consideringhis name for the post o dated1 1'01 GodalVillage 'MahaboobnagarDistrict' Havingregard to the fact that the representationsof the petitionerare pendingbefore the officiairespondents'without going into the merits or demeritsof the case' the writ petition is disposedof directingthe competent authority,.".,...,o*ent No'r ," """::1"r":..."T":""-";":i:: PYc o fa copv of this peritionerdated 11'01'2 o22 a..d pass appropr;;;;"."tr, law,withina period o'tt-t' weeks frorn the date of receipt 6 o'691'dulYaffording the petitioner 3n opportunitJof hearing' pending'if any 'shall stand closed' There Themiscellan*'"l"tn'"""
t" raiffi
sharlbe-no-oro.r-.1."""r=,[RuEcopy,
-';H,',q5{f
itrii1,iq[fuff!,i,u$,1ftr#il:"')ffit
iiffi ";fl,ffiffifNr,3l,!'ilrrllT,,::i:f :'j '^ 1Vffill -GP f6r Revenue, High court for the srate of rerangana at / ixgr[,3""3""&'Akram'SC rorwakrBoard[oPUc] .l BS"rli J
q
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 1t04t2022
ORDER
W.P.No.1Z4S2 of 2022
1HE S
B
a. o
((
() >
17 luN 2022
\C)
*
rtarcfiEo I
rffi{?fiqigi*f;*PEilroN
(o I 1e\o:-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding non-consideration of petitioner for Sadar Kazi post should be disposed of at the stage of admission.
Whether the petitioner should be directed to consider representation pending before the officials.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Syed Nemathulla
State of Telangana
Director Community Development
Chief Executive Officer Lake Board
Tahsildar
Wakf Board
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
