Disposed

Mrs.Aruna Devi Oberoi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC28 Apr 2022WP/13239/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of Writ Petition No. 13239 of 2022 at the admission stage. Confirming that interim orders had restored power supply, the court closed the petition directing respondents to act in accordance with the law if future violations occur.

What did the court decide?

No immediate relief; petition closed as power supply was already restored via interim order. Respondents directed to comply with law.

Mrs.Aruna Devi Oberoi Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 13239 OF 2022

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

[t4rs. Aruna Devi Oberoi, W/o Late Chandra Prakash Oberoi, aged about 74 years,Occ. Housewife,R/o1 -1 0 -2211R6, R.R.Gopal Compound, Brahaman wadi,Begumpet, Hyderabad 5000'l 6.

¶8

Ivlr. Sudheer Lal, S/o M. Damodaran,aged about 58 years, occ.Pvt Job, Rl/o110 221,R.R.Gopal compound, Brahaman wadi, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016.

¶9

Mrs. Padma Venkatesh, W/o Venkatesh.P aged about 49 years, occ.Housewife, R/o 1-10-229/S,R.R.Gopalcompound, Brahamanwadl, Begumpet, Hyderabad 50001 6.

¶10

Ir/r. It/ichael Curran, S/o Late H. J. Curran, aged 63 years, occpn private service R:/o1-10-229110, R. R Gopal compound, Brahaman wadi, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016.

¶11

Mrs. V.Sumathi, W/o Late V. Lingam, aged about 72years, occpn house hold Rlo 1-10-22017, R R Gopal compound, Brahamanwadi, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016.

¶12

..PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, Rep by its principal secretary ,Department of energy, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶15

The Telangana State Transmission Corporation Limited, Rep by its Ctt/D,Vidyuth Souda, Khairtabad, Hyderabad 500 082.

¶16

The DE/OP, TSSPDCL, Greenlands Begumpet , Hyderabad.

¶17

The Asst. Engineer, TSSPDCL, Green land old Airport, Begumpet, Hyderabad.500016

¶18

Dr. Anand Kumar Aganival, S/o late Tej Narayan Aganval age 53 years occpn Doctor Rl/o Plot No. 140, Silpa Brindavan Yallamma Banda, Kukatpally, Hyderabad

¶19

..-RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

¶21

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more^{particularly one in the nature of} WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring^{the action of the respondentsno. 3 and 4 in} disconnecting the^{power supplyto the premisesbearing no.1-10-2211R6,1-10-} 221 , 1-10-22915, 1-1O-229t10,^{1-10-22017,R.R.Gopal Compound, Brahaman wadi,} Begumpet, Hyderabad-^{5OOO16 for meters no. 41000993,41 000992, A1001389,} 41001984, A1000995 without^{there being any default or pilferage and also without} giving any notice, only on the instigation of^{Respondent no.5 as overreaching of} power, illegal, arbitrary, capricious and in violation of^{the principlesof natural} justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to resort^{to anyof suchillegal} disconnection in future.

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶23

Petition under Section^{151 CPC praying thatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High court may be pleasedpleased} to direct the respondents^no. 3^{and 4 to restore the power of the petitioners} premises bearing 1-10-221tR6, 1-10-221 ,1-10-22915,^{1-10-229110,1-10-22017,} R.R.Gopal Compound, Brahaman^{wadi, Begumpet,Hyderabad-500016 for meters} no. A1000993, A1000992,^{A1 001389,A'1001984,A1000995, immediatelypending} disposal of the writ Petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioners^{: SRI. AADESH VARMA}

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent^{No. 1 : GP FOR ENERGY}

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.s2 to 4 : SRl. R VINOD REDDY,SC FOR} TSSPDCL

¶27

Counsel forthe Respondent^No.5: -'

¶28

The Court made the following:^ORDER

I \

THI: HON'tll-ll SRI ,lt'S'ilC'[ . '\BI]lSHI:K^Ii.EI)DY

¶33

WRIl' PEI'I'I'ION No.13239 ol' 2022

¶34

OITDEIT:

¶35

Heard learned counsel appearing^{on behalf of petitioners} and Sri Ii.. Vinod lteddy,^{IearnedStanding Counselappearirrg} on behalf o1' respondent Nos.2 to^{4. Witli their consent,tl.re} presenl Writ Petition is being disposed^{of at the adrnission} stage.

¶36

Questioning^{the action of the respondentNos.3 and 4 in} clisconnecting the power supplv to^{the subject premises} situated at R.R. Gopal Compound,^{Brahauan wadi, Begumpet,} Hyderabad, in respect of the subject^{meters,without there} being any detaLrlt or^{pill'eragear-rd withoutgiving any notice,} thc petitioners have filed the^{present Writ Petition.}

¶37

[,earnccl coLursel tbr the^{petiliollcrs has stated thai} prrrsuant to the intcrin.r order dated^{11 .03.2022passedby tliis} Cour1, the otficial respondents^{have restoredthe power supply} to the subject premises.

¶38

,\Aii..l $.P.:\o.13239 of 202 2

¶39

¶40

Having regard to tl're above, this Writ Petition is closed It is made clear that the official respondents are directed to

¶41

tal<e action against the petitioners strictly in accordance with

¶42

law, in case there is any violation on the part of the petitioners.

¶43

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

¶44

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶45

SD/. T.TIRUMALDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRl. AADESH VARIMA, Advocate IOPUCI

¶50

One CC to SRl. R VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL [OPUC]

¶51

Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶52

Two CD Copies

¶53

One Spare Copy

ABBASI

N N,${ t-

HIGH COURT

DATED | 2810412022

ORDER

e STATE
( (
't
12 lul ?$Il C.
L)
()
,/

¶60

WP.No.13239 of 2022

¶61

CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶62

WITHOUT COSTS

¶63

T.V
v

Mrs.Aruna Devi Oberoi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Aruna Devi Oberoi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ch. Linga Reddy Vs The Principal Secretary

Karnati Pichi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 10 Others

Narra Babu Rao and 4 others Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others

Pola Vinod Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Tirumala Saw Mill Vs State of Telangana

Smt. Vidya Singh Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others