Dismissed

Abdul Khader, Hyd v. Prl.Secy., Revenue (Stamps and Regn), Hyd and 3 Othrs

Telangana HC8 Dec 2022WP/12962/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In W.P. No.12962 of 2014, the Telangana High Court considered a challenge to the registration of a cancellation deed by a Sub Registrar. The petitioner had simultaneously filed a civil suit for declaration of title regarding the same property. The Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that since a comprehensive civil suit was already pending, the petitioner should pursue remedies therein.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of the writ petition along with miscellaneous petitions pending in it, without costs.

Abdul Khader, Hyd Vs Prl.Secy., Revenue (Stamps and… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

t^32s6 l

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE: OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAB/\D (Special Origirral Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DA'/ OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND T\VENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMIhIENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 129'62 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

Abdul Khader, S/o.lvloosa Bhai @ Mo,rsa, aged about 51 years, Occ: Business. Rlo.H.No.22-7 -294129. Inside Diwan Deodi, nrd"r"O"O...rar,r,or

¶9

AND

¶10

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by ils Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps & Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶11

The District Registrar,, Revenue (Stamps {t Registration) Department, Office of District Registrar, Hyderabad District.

¶12

J. The Sub Registrar, Revenue (Stamps & Rr:gistration) Department, Office of SRO, Charminar, Hyderabad.

¶13

Hoora Bai (Died) Per LRs Respondents li & 6

¶14

Abdul Rahim S/o.ltrloosa Bhai @ lt4oosa, R.lo.22-8-512112, lnside Diwan Devdi Haveli, Hyderabad - 500002.

¶15

Zubedia Dlo- h/ossa Bhai @ Ivloosa, W/o- l/d. Sattar, Sait,^oUo.127,4th main Road, Banimantap, Iv'lysore - 570015.

¶16

(RRs 5 & 6 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Respondent No. 4 as Per Court Order dated 08.12.2022 in l.A.No.I of 20221 ...RESPoNDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed theaewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in unilaterally admitting and registering the deed of cancellation of gift settlement through bearing document no.177512012 dated: 12-12.2012 registered in the office of Sub Registrar, Charminar, Hyderabad, presented by the 4th respondent canceling the gift settlement deed bearing document no.145/2008 dated: 28.01.2008 without consent and participation of the donee i.e., the petitioner herein and without

¶18

issuing any notic ) to him before registration of lhe sanre is trrghly iilegal, arbitrary, unjusl, unconstit rtional and in violation of Rule 26 (i) (k . ) of AP Registration Rules, 1960 anc also contrary to the provisions of Rerli:;t'r;lion Act, 1908, and consequently sel aside the document no.17751.2012 ialed 12.12 2012 registered in the office of St : Registrar, Charminar, Hyder,abad

¶19

l.A- NO: 'l OF 20 4(WPMP. NO: 16243 OF 20141

¶20

Petition ur ler Section 151 CPC praying that in the, circumstances stated in

¶21

the affidavit filed r support of the petition, the High Court n ay be pleased to direct the respondents I and 3 not to entertain any documents wr cl- may be presented for registration ir respect of the four (4) shops on grc,un i floor bearing MCH No.22-7 -294121, 12,23 & 24, two (2) shops orr first floor r,:aring IV1CH No.22-7 - 294126 & 27 and remaining first floor residential MCH No. L?.--i -294128 and entire second floor resi( 3ntial MCH No.22-7 -294129 (on plot no.r, i r old yrremises no.227 -253 lo 264) a( measuring 208 sq. yards out of total e)t)nt of 250 sq, yards situated at lnsid€ Diwan Deodi, Hyderabad, by suspending the c,peration of the registered instrun ent of deed of cancellation of gift settlen,€nt daled: 12.12.2O12 registered as dor ument no.177512012 registered in the o'fice of Sub Registrar, Charminar, Hyde abad having been executed by the 4tl^ respordent, pending disposal of the wr . petition

¶22

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

¶23

Between:

¶24

Hoora Bai ( )ied) Per LRs Respondents 5 & 6 2. Abdul Rahir r S/o.[,1oosa Bhai @ Moosa, R/o.22-8-51:2/l.l nsirie Diwan Devdi Haveli, Hyd^rrabad - 500002.

¶25

Zubeda tjlc Mossa Bhai @ Moosa, W/o. luld. Sattar, Sril l?to127,4th main Road ' Banit tantap' [\ilysore - u13.o"luaroa,=o pc]sE, RESpoNDENT'

¶26

AND 'ARTrs/F,Ro

¶27

Abdul Khader, S/o.tr4oosa Bhai @ l,4o rsa. aged about 51 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H No 22-7-2e4l2e, tnside , r..??g?a[JEft!?ii pElfloNER

¶28

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its t)rincipal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps & Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶29

The District Registrar,, Revenue (Stanrps {t Registration) Department, Office of District Registrar, Hyderabad District.

¶30

The Sub Registrar, Revenue (Stamps & R,rgistration) Department, Office of SRO, Charminar, Hyderabad.

¶31

...RESPONDENTS

¶32

Petition under Section^'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, th e High Court may be^pleased to

¶33

recerve the documents filed by the Petitioner /^p'oposed Respondent

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI

¶35

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE

¶36

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6: SRI J. PRABHAKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI Y. V. S. S. SIVA SARMA

¶37

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶38

t I

¶39

I ,

¶40

THE HON'B,E SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SU]DHI'-ER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.12962 of 2Ol1

¶41

ORDER:

¶42

llr rrrcl I^':rr-ntd coLtrrscl litr rhe irctil-ione r, ir arrcrl^,\ssisL:rriL Clort rnrrrr'nl 'lt'rrclcr for Starnps i,rnd Registl:rtio r irpp,:rrirrg lor ri slri)r(i( nl I ,)s I tt., 3 irrrrl Sri .l.l)rrrbhal.:ar- l'rrnlil St rr,rr (,)Lrrqr'l itl)J)c l ng lirr responrlr:rrt Nos.:j and L-,

¶43

2 1' .is Writ Petition is lilcd secki,-rg a^.,,'r il .,f Mirn(larnLrs Lo rlr r'lirr( Lire ,r('tl()n of rcsporrdcnt Nr>.3 in unilirt'J-rlh' :rrlnritlr;ig ,rnc1 rLgr:;llrin r^tht rict'c1 ot'c;rnccilairiorr olGift S(11)rr)cnl thr-ouqh rcsTrou(l( nt Ir r. 1, cancelling the Gift Settlerne.t l )eerl br_'aring rioc:[rrrrt r I No I ]5 ol 2008, :llrrcrl 2{J.01.2O()8. ., tf out corrst nl :rrrcl pirrlrcip:.r: ,rr t;l' thc pr:Liliortr:r hcrein, on l.ht 1r'or-irrcL r:lr;rl lhc sairc is rn vic atior.r ol Rule 26 (r) (k) (i) of Telzrngan: Ruli:s rutclcr ll(.qisr ri rt ron A 1. 1908,

¶44

.1 W rt'n lhC matlcr is i.ikcn up lor <;Ons (l, rr,t ion, it is biougirt Lo lh nolicc ol this Court by Sri J.Prrrlrlr rkar, Ie:trned Se;-iior^(lounst I Lhat aggrieved by the registration <;f ll'c rerr same canr:cllrrtion d cd, rvhich is impugncd in the prescnt 'J/rit i'ritior-t ;rnrl alsr., scc) rrrg rr rclie l' ol' dcciar:rlior-r ol Litl- tl c ti tilioner hcrt in lrzrs alr arlv liled a suit in O,S.No.599 of 2 ] l') on hc llle ol

XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court. lhcicrabzrcl ancl rhe said suit is pcr-rding for consideration

¶49

'lhc sztntc is 11.)t (lisl)uti'il trr' lclrnt.rl r,rLrrrsr.l lor rlrc

¶50

petltloner.

¶51

In view of the fact that the pctiti()ner has alrcady instituted a comprehensive civil suit sceking dcclaration ol titlc in respect ol the property, u,hich is covered bv thc impugncd cancellation deed and also subsequent registercd documcnts executed by respondent Nos.5 and 6, this Court is of thc considered view that it would be appropriatc lor tl'tc 1-rctitioncr^lc> pursue the said suit instead of furthcr pursing thc present u'rit petition. As the petitioner has already sought lor a rcliel of clcclaration ol title and cancellation ol various rcgistered documents by filing the said suit, the Writ l)etition is dismisscd leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the remedies in the penciing suit in O.S.No.599 ol 2Ol9 on the iilc ol Court of XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, l-lyderabad.

¶52

Miscellaneous Petitions, if^{any, penciing} in^{this writ petition}

¶53

shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to^costs.

¶54

SD/- I. NAGA T,AKSIIMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶55

//TRUE COPY//

¶56

SE FFICER

¶57

To, 1. One CC^{to Sri tvlohd Moin Ahmed Quadri l\dvocale [OPtlCl} 2. Two^{CCs to GP For n"u"nJ",nighCorrt toiGe Stite of Tblangana[OUT]} a. Oii"^{CC to Sri Y. V. S. S. Sarma' Advocate(OPUC)} 4. Two^{CD CoPies} 5. One^SPareCoPY MBC BS^ ,t+Y--

T{IGH COURT

DATtil.): C811212022

nq L

ORDER

WP.ltlrr, 1 29t62 of 201 4

¶63

DISMISSING THE^II1IFIIT PETITION

¶64

^/I'I'FIOUT COSTS

¶65

/aI
)t'
q

Abdul Khader, Hyd v. Prl.Secy., Revenue (Stamps and Regn), Hyd and 3 Othrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Khader, Hyd v. Prl.Secy., Revenue (Stamps and Regn), Hyd and 3 Othrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Dixon Stock broking (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs State of Telangana and 3 others

Jarpula Venkanna, Vs The State of Telangana

Chinthapatla Nagaraju Vs The State of Telangana

Vattipalli Krishna Murthy Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Gulam Samiuddin Vs The State of Telangana

S.Panduranga Rao Vs State of Telangana