The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 12495 of 2014 as infructuous in an order dated July 18, 2022, regarding land acquisition for Metro Rail expansion.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 12495 OF 2014
Between:
...WRIT PETITIONERS
AND
...FIESPONDENTS
Petition Undt' Article 226 of the Constitution c,f lrrdi;lpraTing thatin the circumstances statr d in the affidavit filed therewith, tl'e llighCourt maybe pleased to issue a'Vrit, Order or Direction more particularly :ne rn the nature of "Writ of Mandamus' by declaring the action of the Respontlerntsmore particularly the Respondent Nc ;.2 to 5 herein are bent upon try ng tcJrspossess the Writ Petitioners herein b, trying to demolish their Dhobhighat,{lituated in Sy.No.112l2, admeasuring Ac.00 CBguntas(962 Sq.Yards), Situated :rtTalac Chanchalam, Near Musi River, Ch lderghat, Hyderabad, towards laying ot'ttlatro Rail Line by the Hyderabad Metro R ril who is Respondent No.5 herein, inlhe, abs,ence ofpaying compensation aspe 'The Right to Fair Compensation anrl Transparency in Land Acquisition and Re rabilitation Act and Resettlement Acl. 2lCt1 3 (Act No.30 of 2013), inspite of r rceiving the Petitioners representat on rit. 06-03-2014 as arbitrary, ex-facie legal, dereliction of duty, discriminati,:n and violation of principles of natur, I justice and also against the prin:it,l:s of equity and unconstitutional and consequently this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to acquire the affected portion of Ac.00-08 guntas of structural area of tt: Petitioners of the aforesaid land by tr,aying compensation under the aforesaid 3tatutory Act by giving them proper cpp rrtunity of hearing in the interest ofjustice
l.A.NO:1 OF 2014(V1 ']lVlP. NO: 15693 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir(:utnstances stated in the affidavit filed in s rpport of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to direct the Respondents m, re particulady the Nos.2 to I not to,lispossess or demolish the Petitioners affecl :d portion in view of the proposed laying of Metro Rail Line in respect of Sy.No. 1 1l /2, admeasuring Ac.00-08 guntas (9612 Sc.YarCs), Situated at Talab Chanchalam, lear Musi River, Chaderghat, Hyderab,ad pending disposal of the main writ petitior
Counsel forthe Petiti ner: SRI.L.RAM SINGH, ADV FOR SRI.Nrt:lR AFMED KHAN
Counsel for the Resp ndent Nos.1&3:GP FOR MUNCIPAL ,ADIUI\ AND JRBAN DEV
Counsel for the Resp, ndent No.2 : SRI.C.DAMODAR REDE,Y
Counsel for the Res rc,ndent Nos.4 & 6 : GP FOR REVENIJI:
Counsel for the Res )ondent No.5 : THE ADVOCATE GENt:Fr\L
Counsel for the Res rondent Nos.7 & 8 : GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following ORDER
THD IION'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHTIYAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTIC E SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No. 12495 of 2Ol4
ORDER:
Mr. L.Ram Singh, Iearned counsel represenling Mr. Nazir Ahmed Khan, learned counsel lor the petitioners, subrnits orr instructrons that the lvrit petition has become inliuctuous.
stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
SD/- G. SIREESHA ASSISTAN
/
//TRUE COPY// 'IlD L- SECTI N
S.A. GJP ,wr,D
,.<br>
i,r
HIGH COURT
DATED:18107'2022
::::
\Er
',
(
! $" fi
F
$
cs
o
.)- Ct1
\v
/
ORDER
WP.No.12495 of 2014
DISMISSING iHE W.P
AS INFRUCTIIOUS WITHOUT COST:S.
v'.r.
N
/9"
Mr. Mohammed Qasim
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Ujjal Bhuyan
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
