The High Court for the State of Telangana dismissed the pending writ appeal and writ petition seeking quashing of orders by the Special Tribunal, as the matter was withdrawn by the appellants without costs.
The writ appeal and writ petition were dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THEFOURTH DAYOF MARCH TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLETHE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTiCEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT APPEAL Nos .59 ot 2022& W.P.N o.19901of2021
WRIT PP ALN :59 F 2022
WritAppeatunderClausel5oftheLettersPatentappealpreferredagainSt the orderdated2311112)21inW P No 19901ol 2021 on the file of theHighCou(' Between:
ti
'1 Sudireddv Pulla Reddy, S/oRamReddy'Nalgonda (Died per L'Rs) z. iiiiiliii Li'ii.liiri"Wrollie s,-i p'iti' ne:oav'agieoahdrrt 60 vears occ Aoricutture,FVo.Juwrguoem"irTl"]"ir,."i,ialGi".;i[Jr:",NirketpallyMandal, N;loonda District. 'HftJin5#'li:,uy'&n!l8i ffi "x"jdi.i%*fl""#:"39cf;'x1";'3.?5, L."8. Naqar,HYderabad. 4. Gade Raiitha,W/o. VenkatReddv,Aged about 43 years'Occ Agriculture' ,y"t,nu",in;,:!nly"g;[iy"s'":#fi:'f qi:,ⅈ,i-qT,?Lll1r!ver occ Adriculture. wo.n.r.ro.'6--i-ia6, Hor.ing boaril co"tony,Rajiv Park road, f..tilgon-Oa ton,Mandal and District ...A''ELLANTS AND ReYgnYe 1 The Stateof Telengana, Representedby its -Secretary' iAi"Iq;;"-"t-iiD"p'artment,'secieiariat''tanxn Bhavan' Tank-Bund' Hvderabad. 2 rtE'il"ri""t tn"Special Tribunal,Rep byCollector and District Magistrate Naloonda, NalqondaDistrict. 3 iInl]roii r.rit[utpallvMandal. NalsondaDistrict' 4 i;;i;;;;i;v;;inilwro.t-ate i.iaitaneotv. asedabout63 vears' Ase 62 ;;.: b;'H;;'"; iioro, nvo'L u,i g, i it Lag e IN a"rkerp aII vm a n da l'N aI gon d a "rnv bistrict. GundlapallyMandal, Nalgonda [Jrstrrct' I b' ...RESPONDENTS
...RESPONDENTS
IA 1 F20
Petition underSection 15'1 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition,theHigh courtmay be pleasedto suspend theoperatlonof order passed by theLearned Single Judge in W P No 19901of2021,dl.23-11-2o2lincludingorderpassedinCaseNo.F2l Spl,Tribunal/og8o12021 dt.O4'02-2021andthe order in Review Petition-inCase
-..*.=.
l
No. F2lSpl.Tribun ayo98o/2o21 dl. 09-07-2021 , on the file ofthe 2ndrespondent,
pending disposal of Writ Appeal.
Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. VANAM VISHWANATHAM
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI M. MADHAVA REDDY
WRIT PETITION N O: 19901 OF 2021
Between:
AND
.RESPONDENTS
Pelition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to ilsue an order, direction or Writ one in the nature writ of Certiorary and after calling for records from the court of the Special Tribunal, Nalgonda in Case No. F2lSpl.Tribu na11098012021 Dt. Ogl07l2O21 including the order Dt.0410212021 of 2nd Respondent, quash the order in case no. F2lSpl.Tribuna l/0 9BO|2O21 Dt. 0910712021 including the order Dt.04tO2t2O21 of 2nd Respondent.
I
IAN O:1oF 2021
PetitionunderSection 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstatedin the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition' lhe High Court may be pleasedto dispensewith the Originalorder in Case No'F2lspl Tribunal/0980/2021Dt 04- 02-2021 ,and Pass
NO:2O 20 1
Petitionunder Sectio n 151CPC prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition'the High Court may be Pleased to suspendthe operation of order passedby the Learned SPecialTribunal' Nalgondain New case No' F2lSplTribunal/0980/2021 Dt. 09-07-2021including the orderDt. 04-02-2021 of 2nd Respondent pendingdisposal of WritPetitionand
pa ss
lA NO: 3OF 2021
Between:
vrsocc
i:1'J:fl31,1"-l3TL?a,H'"';Vil3$1II,',I!?iJu'*?'"3ilti3"'""'fll';tP'?62 CunOtapattyMandal Nalgonda urstrlcl' Lr'
Petitioner/Res Pon de nt No'4
ANO
, |:i1?#i,til*3'?',,1,P^iXi",j;'Na rsond a Di strict ...Respondents/RespondentNo'1to 3
-1
//
;
Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedin supportof the petilion'the High Court may be pleasedto vacate the lnterimOrders passedin l.A No.z of 2021, in W P No1990'1of 2021' Dated03/09/202landOlllOl2O2l,consequentlydismisstheWritPetition'
CounseI for theApPEIIANTS:SRI' VANAM VISHWANATHAM
Counsel for theRespondent Nos.'lto 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for theRespondent No'4:SRI M' MADHAVAREODY
The Court madethe following:COMMON JUOGMENT
I
L (
TTIE EON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA STIARMA
AND
THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR STIAVILI
w.A.No.sg oF 2022 & w.P.No.1990l of 2O2L
COMMON JUDGMENT .,...
Lr;ir-t-rcri c()Lirtsrl lbl'.llr',1i)pcil.illis irtlt 1lt'tiitOIlr't s 1lt-r,r's ftrr ilithdll.iu':rl ol thc prescnt ivrir appcitl iisucli :is ther':iL pctition with a libertr,to 1al<e rccoLtrse to the remcdicsaYajltrblc Llnder civil law.
With the aforesaid liberty, the prcsent \Yrit appcaland u'rit petition are dismissed as withdra$'n.
Pending miscellaneous applicatlons, if any, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
I
//TRUE GOPY//
SD/. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR / DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECT O FFI R
To,
1 . One CC to Sri Vanam Vishwanatham, Advocate IOPUC] 2. TWo CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri M. Madhava Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare Copy CHR SB -\X.iA
6
(
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/0312022
1H E SIA
J (
>z
(, 13 l',ll
,+
COMMON JUDGMENT
W.A.Nos.59 ot 2022 & W.P.No.19901 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL & WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
A
\ ) r^n
;$F,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal and writ petition should be allowed or dismissed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sudireddy Pulla Reddy
Sudireddy Laxmamma
Gangula Sumathi
Gade Ralitha
The State of Telangana
The Court of the Special Tribunal
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
