Dismissed

Sri. M.Raja Sekhar v. Venkata Swamy Salade

Telangana HC7 Apr 2022WA/482/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed counsel for the appellant to withdraw Writ Appeal No. 482 of 2019 pending against the Telangana State Public Service Commission. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one, without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Appeal is accorded. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.

Sri. M.Raja Sekhar Vs Venkata Swamy Salade — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶5

WRIT APPEAL NO: 482 OF 2019

¶6

Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 19-12-2018 passed in Writ Petition No. 42005 of 2016 on the file of the High Court.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sri lV.Raja Sekhar; S/o Sri.lvl.Yadaiah, Aged About 34 Years, Resident of 5- 123114, StreetNo.S, SBR Colony, Near SBR Community Hall,Boduppal, It/edipalli Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

¶9

...APPELLANT/R.3

¶10

AND

¶11

Venkata Swamy Salade, Sio. Yadagiri Salade, Hindu, aged about 41 years, un-employee, Residnet of H.No. 4-6-3213, Baba Nagar, Nacharam, Hyderabad.

¶12

Respo ndenUPetitioner

¶13

The Telangana State Public Service Commission, Represented by its Secretary, Prathibha Bhavan, M.J.Road, Hyderabad.

¶14

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Public Health and Municipal Engineering Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

¶15

Dadiga Karthik Kiran, Aged about 31 years, Unemployee, HT No. 9'150505507 No 2-2-7351A, Pochamma Temple Street, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

¶16

...Respondents/Respondents 1,2 & 4

¶17

IA NO: 3 OF 2019

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Order dated 19th December, 2018 passed in Writ Petition No.42005 of 2016 pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.

¶19

lA NO: 4 OF 2019

¶20

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High courtmay be pleasedto} suspend the Result Notification^{No.9/2015 dt.29thAugusl,2015 as modifiedby} Addendum Notification dt.'16th^{It/ay, 2019, issued by the 2nd Respondent} Commission,^pending disposal^{of the above saidWrit Appeal.}

¶21

Counsel for the Appellant:^{SRI K.V.S[VA PRASAD}

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1: J SUDHEER}

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent^{No'2:SRI D.BALAKISHAN RAO'SC for TSPSC}

¶24

Counsel forthe Respondent^{No.3: GP FOR SERVICES-I}

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.4: SRI V.MAHESWARREDDY}

¶26

The Court delivered the following:

¶27

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF It]ST ICE SATISH HANDRA S

¶28

AND

¶29

THE ON'BLE S I IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶30

W.A.No.482 of 2079

¶31

JUDGMENT:^{hrth.t thr'ht tE (.btt} l,,tnr^{:t/nh (.t,ut.!rd} shddn)

¶32

The presenr Writ Appeal is arising our of order

¶33

dzted 19.1,2.2018, passed by thc learned Single Judge in W.p.No.42005 of 2016.

¶34

lramed counsel ior the appellanr seeks to withdraw the Writ Appeal

¶35

with liberty to file a flresh one in case need arises.

¶36

Pcrmission is accorded.

¶37

The Wnt Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the

¶38

aforesaid liberry.

¶39

No costs.

¶40

Miscellaneous peritions, pending if any, stand dismissed.

¶41

<br>

¶42

To,

¶43

SD/- B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY:'GIZRAR

¶44

//TRUE COPY//

¶45

secrrffiircia

¶46

'1. Two CCs to the GP for Services-|, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT] 2. One CC to SRI K.V.SIVA PRASAD, Advocate [OpUCl

¶47

One CC to SRI J.SUDHEER. Advocate tOpUCi 4. One CC to SRI D.BALAKTSHAN RnO, SC ror r'SpSC IOPUCI

¶48

One CC to SRI V.MAHESWAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶49

Two C.D. Copies

¶50

One Spare Copy. MRC NN .,,

HIGH COURT

DATED:O710412O22

4
21 luL ?t1-1
c

JUDGMENT

WA.No.482 ol 2O19

DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶57

X-
k

Sri. M.Raja Sekhar v. Venkata Swamy Salade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. M.Raja Sekhar v. Venkata Swamy Salade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority Vs K. Vittal Reddy

Shapuram Anil Vs Kanchana Srinivas and 3 others

Mohammed Ikram Al Hashmi Vs Talari Rajendra Prasad

Telangana State Tourism Contract Vs Government of Telangana

Nisha Arora, Hyderabad and Another Vs M. Krishna Das, Hyderabad and 3 Others

Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Garvandula Vijaya