Disposed

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. E.Niranjan [Died and 3 Ors.

Telangana HC22 Mar 2022MACMA/1292/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of Motor Accidents Claims Appeals referred to Lok Adalat. An award dated 11.12.2021 settled the compensation and costs, leading to the disposal of the appeals without cost.

What did the court decide?

The appeals are disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat award dated 11.12.2021. Claims settled with proportionate shares and no interest on the settlement amount.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs E.Niranjan [Died and 3 Ors. — Telangana HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY^{OF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G.^{SRI DEVI}

¶5

MACMA. Nos. 1292 and 1706 of 2010

¶6

MACMA. No.1292 of2010

¶7

Appeal Under Section 173 of M.V.^{Act against the JudgmenVDecreein} O.P.No.626 ot 2007 dated 17.09.2009 on^{the file of the Court of the MACT} -cum-^ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court,^Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Bajaj Alllanz General lnsurance Co.^{Ltd., rep by its Divisional Manager,608 &} 609,-Oth Floor, Block-2, White^{House,Begumpet, Hyderabad.}

¶10

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.2

¶11

AND

¶12

E.Niranjan, S/o Yellaiah, aged 50^{years, Occ:Nil (died)}

¶13

Ms.E.Kavitha, D/o.E.Niranjan, aged 25^{years,Occ: Household}

¶14

., Ms.E.Sridevi, D/o.E.Niranjan, aged 23^{years,Occ: Household} Both are residing at H.No.2-3-68/fu2, New^{Tirumala Nagar Colony, Amberpet,} Hyderabad

¶15

.,.RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶16

V.Narsimha Rao, S/o.V.Buggaiah, Aged^{Major,Occ: BusinessRi/o.H.No.2-} 82/1 , Mangalpally, Amangal, Mahabubnagar^District.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT^No.1

¶18

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI T. MAHENDER^RAO

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI^{P. RAMAKRISHNAREDDY}

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: NONE^APPEARED

¶21

MACMA.No.1706 of 2010

¶22

Appeal Under Section 173 of M.V. Act against the JudgmenUDecree .ⁱⁿ O.P.No.626 of 2007 dated 17.09.2009 on the file of the Court of the MACT -cum- ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶23

Between:

¶24

E.Niranjan, [Claimant No.1 died, Appellants 2 & 3 who are already on record were recorded in the Lower Courtl

¶25

E.Kavitha, D/o.late E.Niranjan, aged 25^years, Occ: Household

¶26

E.Sridevi, D/o.late E.Niranjan, aged 23^years, Occ: Household Both R/o.H.No.2-3-68/A/2, New Tirumala Nagar Colony, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

¶27

...APPE LLANTS/PETITIONERS

¶28

AND

¶29

V.Narsimha, S/o.V.Buggaiah, FUo.H.No.2-8211, Mangalpally, Amangal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶30

The Baja Allianz General lnsurance Compa ny Limited, rep by its Divisional Manager, 6028 and 609, 6th Floor, Block-2, hite House, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶31

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶32

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI P. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

¶33

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI T. MAHENDER RAO

¶34

Counsel for the Respondent No.'1 : NONE APPEARED

¶35

The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT

¶36

¶37

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI

¶38

M.A.C.M.A.Nos.1292 and^'1706 of 2010

¶39

COMMON JUDGMENT:-

¶40

Pursuant to the request made by the Counsel appearing for both the parties, the matters were referred to Lok Adatat.

¶41

On 11 .12.2071 the matters were settted before the Lok Adatat

¶42

and an award was passed by the Lok Adatath.

¶43

ln view of the above, both the M.A.C.M.A.s are disposed of in terms of the award, dated 11 .12.2071, passed by the Lok

¶44

Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶45

Miscettaneous applications, if any, pending shatl stand

¶46

ctosed.

¶47

ott'tt&**t::J::: SD/.K.ONESlM

¶48

To,

¶49

//TRUE COPYII

¶50

The Chairman, MACT -cum- ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court,

¶51

¶52

Hyderabad. (with records)

¶53

One CC to Sri T. Mahender Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

¶54

One CC to Sri P. Ramakrishna Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI

¶55

Two CD Copies

¶56

One Spare Copy gbr

¶57

HIGH COURT

¶58

DATED: 2210312022

¶59

o f. 1tr E S 16 ;"c
(
I () (
:""
I \ 14 JUL IW o
,}:
D;: ^ t.
2010 .--{. r,4T ctr

¶60

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶61

MACMA.Nos.1292 and 1706 of 2010

¶62

DISPOSING OF THE MACMA'S IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD wrrHour cosrs

I
*l
I

.ii
1 tiil
I I
I

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT t HIGH OURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR TH STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD [Under^Secllon 1? of he Legol Services Authorllies Acl, I tB7 (Cenlrol Act)l Date:11-12-2021 resent: 1. Hon,ble Dr. Justice G.yethirajulu, j(Flrmer Judge, High Court ot erstwhle indiria eradesh) Chairman . 2, Dr.J.Vijaya Lakshmi, Advocate, Member 3. Sri M.Venkat ramana Yadav, Advocate, cc)o() Member l-/ MACMA Nos 292 of 2O1O and 1706 ol 2O1O + For the Befor on'b le High Court) AGAINST O.P.No.626 of 2007

¶67

(On the fite of the tor Vehictes Accidents Ctaims Tribunal :Cum : ilt Addt. c lef Judge: City Civit Court: Hyderabad)

¶68

Between:-

¶69

I ACMA No.1 292 of 2O1O

¶70

Bajaj Attianz General lnsur_dnce Co. Ltd., rep. by its Divisional Managbr, 608 e 609, 6th ftoor, Btock-2, White House, Begumpet, Hyderabad. I

¶71

-i .,.Appellant/Respondent No,2 i AND

¶72

1. E. Niranjan, S/o.Yettai'ah, aged 50 years, Occ: Nit (died) l

¶73

1. Ms. E. Kavitha, D/o. E. Niranian Aged: 25 Years, Occ: Household

¶74

1. Ms. E. Sridevi, D/o. E. Niranjan Aged: 23 Years, Occ: Househotd Both are residing at H.No.2-3-68/ Al2, New Tirumala Nagar Cotony, Amberpet, Hyderabad. .... Respondents/Petitioners

¶75

1. V. Narsimha, 5/o. V.Buggaiah, aged Major, Occ: Business, R/o, H.No. 2-82l1, Mangatpatty, Amanga[, Mahaboobnagar distrjct. .... Respondents./Respondent No. 1

¶76

I,{ACMA No.1706 ot 2010

¶77

Between:'l. E. Niranjan (Ctaimant No.1 died, Appettants No.2 and 3 who are already on record were recorded in the Lower Court)

¶78

1. E. Kavitha D/o. Late E. Niranjan Aged: 25 Years, Occupation: Househotd

¶79

1. E. Sridevi D/o. Late E. Niranjan Aged: 23 Years, Occupation: Household Both residents of H. No.2-3-58/A/2,

¶80

.New Tiruma[a Nagar Cotony, Amberpet, Hyderd bad.

¶81

'...App^el a nerS 4\l

¶82

¶83

1 iI

¶84

AN D 1. V. Resident.of H.No.Z-gZl1, Mangatpatty, Narsimha S/o. V. Buggaiah, : Amangat, Mahaboobnagar District.

¶85

The Bajaj General lnsurance Company Limited, Represented by its Divisionat managei, 608 an; 609, 6s.F[oo1 Btock-2, White House, Belumpet, Hyderabad.

¶86

.... Respondents/Respondents

¶87

Counse( for Appellants/Ctaimants/ Respondents : Sri p.Rama Krishna Reddy, Advocate

¶88

Counset for Respondent No.2 : Sri T.Mahender Rao, Advocate lnsurance Company

¶89

These appeals having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned counser for the parties and arso the parties, the foltowing award is passed:

¶90

AWARD

¶91

ompensation Awardedbythe Tribuna[/ Lower Court. C	Rs.5,68,000/-($ eightythousandi costs andinterest thedateofpd reatization.	upeesFivetakhssixty onty)withproportionate @7,5%^perannumfrom titiontittthedateof
Compensation Awarded (SetttementReached)in the * )o ! cEs LokAda[at.	a n, sit n d a t di on t de ted r m e a Pos r cou t wa a d r d e Rs 0 00 00 e b a d p depo Companyadditio withinonemon ofcopyoftheA	attywithoutanyinterest from the dateofreceipt moun ]0"", ed ht e a o m nt U a TEady n n 0 5 C)f ht e I owe t th n re te t s n a d n o e a on kh to v t e h n U s a r c n e by rd
dnsation, Apportion ifany	on s h UC e n a ts o pp Resp entitted theirres	ht e C m s o it a a t n s n de st N z o & 3 aTC ivesharesasperthe
	apportionment Tribunat/LowerC	made by the urt.

¶92

Additionat Direction(s):

¶93

The Appetlants are entitted to the refund "1^{.*.t Fee paid on these}

¶94

appeats.

¶95

The amount atready deposited by the lnsur an Company sha[[ be^given credit to.

¶96

3, The Ctaimants/Appetlants/Respondents No.2 & are permitted to withdraw their respective shares.

¶97

ln token of consent for the above setttement and ward, the parties and their

¶98

counsel haye signed this award in our presence.

¶99

ln terms of the compromise arrived at between e parties, both the appeats i.e., MACMA'1292 of 2010 and MACMA No. 1706 of 2OlO s d disposed of.

¶100

6.\

¶101

JL'rua- \ o , nrAcinA -^tr trf^r-\zc . ad \toe lra,\toe lra,

¶102

/ . ad \toe lra,\toe lra,
Petitioner Respondent (s)
Pr
For gsjajAllianz General lns .anca Co. Ltd
P> vta-E*- N'-'--
Autho gnatory
v7 fur
P
counsel for Petitio er s) Counse I for Res ondent s
)
t'LtJ ''
0u
Member
Mem r
Chair
Date:11'12.2021
';ttt5l'{ffiPr eorrY
Q,I"ffi cry
e)
-*','"?',t j;1: f :'ii::: ";I: ]:
HighCourt Buildxr:5' il!dcrlDsa-r J! l
I
Slate
I

¶103

--; lt

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. E.Niranjan [Died and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. E.Niranjan [Died and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Vs Poloju Narshimha Chary and Anr.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Vs Rampalli Omkaram and Anr.

Syed Ahamed Vs Jaidi Pedda Ganga Reddy

The United India Insurance Company Limited, Vs Rahana Begu

Smt Gousiya Begum R/O Balkonda, Nizamabad Dist Vs B. Ramesh and 2 Others

Smt.P.Aruna and 3 Ors. Vs K.Ramulu and Anr.